Lucifer and Ahriman. Lecture 3 of 5.
Rudolf Steiner, November 4, 1919:
The phase of
evolution beginning in our own time has a very special character. The same may,
of course, be said of each epoch but in every case it is a matter of defining
the particular characteristics. The present phase of evolution may be
characterized in a general way by saying that all the experiences confronting
mankind in the physical world during the earth's further existence will
represent a decline, a retrogression. The time when human progress was made
possible through the constant refinement of the physical forces is already
over. In the future, too, mankind will progress, but only through
spiritual development, through development on a higher level than that of
the processes of the physical plane. Men who rely entirely on the processes of
the physical plane will find in them no source of satisfaction. An indication
given in spiritual science a long time ago, in the Lecture-Course on the
Apocalypse, namely
that we are heading for the “War of All against All”, must from now onwards be
grasped in all its significance and gravity; its implications must not remain in
the realm of theory but also come to expression in the actions, the whole
behavior, of human beings.
The fact that —
to use a colloquialism — people in the future are not going to get much fun out
of developments on the physical plane will bring home to them that further
evolution must proceed from spiritual forces.
This can be
understood only by surveying a lengthy period of evolution and applying what is
discovered to experiences that will become more and more general in the future.
The trend of forces that will manifest in the well-nigh rhythmical onset of war
and destruction — processes of which the present catastrophe is but the
beginning — will become only too evident. It is childish to believe that
anything connected with this war can bring about a permanent era of peace for
humanity on the physical plane. That will not be so. What must come about on the
earth is spiritual development. Its direction and purport will be clear
to us if, after surveying a comparatively lengthy epoch preceding the Mystery of
Golgotha, we bear in mind something of the meaning of the Mystery of Golgotha
and then try to envisage the impulse of that Event working in the future
evolution of mankind.
We have studied
the Mystery of Golgotha from many different points of view and will do so again
today by characterizing, very briefly, the civilization which preceded it — let
us say as far back as the third millennium B.C. — and then
continued for a time as pagan culture in the period of Christian development
itself.
Within this
pagan culture, the utterly different Hebraic-Jewish culture took root, having
Christianity as its offspring.
The nature of
pagan culture can best be understood if we realize that it was the outcome of
knowledge, vision, and action born of forces much wider in range than those
belonging to present earthly existence. It was actually through Hebraic culture
that the moral element was first inculcated into humanity. In paganism the
moral element did not occupy a place separate and apart; this pagan
culture was such that man felt himself a member of the whole cosmos.
This is
something we must particularly bear in mind. — The human being living on earth
within the old pagan world felt himself membered into the whole cosmos. He felt
how the forces at work in the movements of the stars extend into his own
actions, or, better said, into the forces taking effect in his actions. What
later passed for astrology, and does so still, is but a reflection — and a very
misleading one at that — of the ancient wisdom gleaned from contemplation of the
stars in their courses and then used as the basis for precepts governing human
action.
These ancient
civilizations can be understood only if light is thrown by spiritual science
upon human evolution in its outer aspect some four or five thousand years before
Christ.
We are apt to
speak in rather a matter-of-fact way of the second or the first post-Atlantean
epochs, but we err if we picture man's existence on the earth in the fifth,
sixth, or seventh millennia B.C. as having been similar to our present existence.
It is quite correct that men living on the earth in those ancient times had a
kind of instinctive soul-life, in a certain respect more akin to the soul-life
of animals than to that of present-day man. But it is a very one-sided
conception of human life to say that in those ancient times men were more like
animals. In tenor of soul, the human being then moving about the earth was, it
is true, more like the animal; but those human-animal bodies were used by beings
of soul-and-spirit who felt themselves members of the supersensible worlds,
above all of the cosmic worlds. And provided we go back far enough, say to the
fifth pre-Christian millennium, it may be said that men made use of animal
bodies as instruments rather than feeling themselves within those bodies. To
characterize these men accurately, one would have to say that when they were
awake, they moved about with an instinctive life of soul like that of animals,
but into this instinctive life of soul there shone something like dreams from
their sleeping state, waking dreams. And in these waking dreams they perceived
how they had descended, to use animal bodies merely as instruments. This inner,
fundamental tenor of the human soul then came to expression as a religious rite,
in the Mithras cult with its main symbol of the God Mithras riding on a bull,
above him the starry heavens to which he belongs, and below him the earth
to which the bull belongs. This symbol was not, strictly speaking, a symbol to
these men of old; it was a vision of reality. Man's whole tenor of soul
made him say to himself: When I am outside my body at night I belong to the
forces of the cosmos, of the starry heavens; when I wake in the morning, I make
use of animal instincts in an animal body.
Then human
evolution passed, figuratively speaking, into a period of twilight. A certain
dimness, a certain lethargy, spread over the life of humanity; the cosmic dreams
receded and instinct gained the upper hand.
The attitude of
soul formerly prevailing in men was preserved through the Mysteries, mainly
through the Asiatic Mysteries. But in the fourth millennium B.C. and until the beginning of the third, humanity in general —
when uninfluenced by the Mystery wisdom — lived an existence pervaded by a more
or less dim, twilight consciousness. In Asia and the then known world, it may be
said that during the fourth and at the beginning of the third millennium before
the Mystery of Golgotha, man's life of soul was dim and instinctive. But the
Mysteries were there, into which, through the powerful rites and ceremonies, the
spiritual worlds were able to penetrate. And it was from these centers that men
received illumination.
At the beginning
of the third millennium a momentous event took place. — The root-cause of this
dim, more instinctive life may be characterized by saying that as a being of
spirit-and-soul, man was still unable at that time to make use of the human
organs of intellect. These organs were already within him, they had taken shape
in his physical constitution, but the being of spirit-and-soul could not make
use of them. Thus men could not acquire knowledge through their own thinking,
through their own powers of intellectual discernment. They were dependent upon
what was imparted to them from the Mysteries. And then, about the beginning of
the third millennium, a momentous event took place in the east of Asia.
A child of a
distinguished Asiatic family of the time was allowed to grow up in the precincts
of the Mystery-ceremonies. Circumstances were such that this child was actually
permitted to take part in the ceremonies, undoubtedly because the priests
conducting the rites in the Mysteries felt it as an inspiration that such a
child must be allowed to participate. And when the being incarnate in that child
had reached the age of about 40 — approximately that age — something very
remarkable came to light. It became evident and there is no doubt at all that
the priests of the Mysteries had foreseen the event prophetically — it became
evident that this man, who had been allowed to grow up in the precincts of one of
the Mystery-centers in East Asia, began suddenly, at the age of about 40, to
grasp through the faculty of human intellect itself what had formerly come into
the Mysteries through revelation, and only through revelation. He was as it were
the first to make use of the organs of human intellect, but still in association
with the Mysteries.
Translating into
terms of our present language how the priests of the Mysteries spoke of this
matter, we must say: In this man, Lucifer himself was incarnated — no more and
no less than that! — It is a significant, momentous fact that in the third
millennium before Christ an incarnation of Lucifer in the flesh actually took
place in the east of Asia. And from this incarnation of Lucifer in the flesh —
for this being became a teacher — there went forth what is described as the
pre-Christian, pagan culture which still survived in the Gnosis of the earliest
Christian centuries.
It would be
wrong to pass derogatory judgment on this Lucifer-culture. For all the beauty
produced by Greek civilization, even the insight that is still alive in ancient
Greek philosophy and in the tragedies of Aeschylus, would have been impossible
without this Lucifer-incarnation.
The influence of
the Lucifer-incarnation was still powerful in the south of Europe, in the north
of Africa, and in Asia Minor during the first centuries of Christendom. And when
the Mystery of Golgotha had taken place on earth, it was essentially the
Luciferic wisdom through which it could be understood. The Gnosis, which set
about the task of grasping the import of the Mystery of Golgotha, was
impregnated through and through with Luciferic wisdom. It must therefore be
emphasized, firstly, that at the beginning of the third millennium B.C. there was a Chinese incarnation of Lucifer; at the beginning
of our own era the incarnation of Christ took place. And to begin with, the
significance of the incarnation of Christ was grasped because the power of the
old Lucifer-incarnation still survived. This power did not actually fade from
man's faculty of comprehension until the fourth century A.D.; and even then, it had its aftermath, its ramifications.
To these two
incarnations — the Lucifer-incarnation in ancient times and the incarnation of
the Christ which gives the earth its meaning — a third incarnation will be added
in a future not so very far distant. And the events of the present time are
already moving in such a way as to prepare for it.
Of the
incarnation of Lucifer at the beginning of the third millennium B.C., we must
say: through Lucifer, man has acquired the faculty of using the organs of his
intellect, of his power of intellectual discernment. It was Lucifer himself, in
a human body, who was the first to grasp through the power of intellect what
formerly could be imparted to man only through revelation, namely, the content
of the Mysteries.
What is now in
preparation, and will quite definitely come to pass on earth in a none too
distant future, is an actual incarnation of Ahriman.
As you know,
since the middle of the fifteenth century we have been living in an era in which
it behooves mankind to come more and more into possession of the full power of
consciousness. It is of the very greatest importance that men should
approach the coming incarnation of Ahriman with full consciousness of this
event. The incarnation of Lucifer could be recognized only by the prophetic
insight of the priests of the Mysteries. Men were also very unconscious of what
the incarnation of Christ and the Event of Golgotha really signified. But they
must live on towards the incarnation of Ahriman with full
consciousness amid the shattering events which will occur on the
physical plane. Amid the perpetual stresses of war and other tribulations of the
immediate future, the human mind will become very inventive in the domain of
physical life. And through this very growth of inventiveness in physical life —
which cannot be averted in any way or by any means — the bodily existence of a
human individuality in whom Ahriman can incarnate will become possible and
inevitable.
From the
spiritual world this Ahrimanic power is preparing for incarnation on the earth,
is endeavoring in every conceivable way to make such preparation that the
incarnation of Ahriman in human form may be able to mislead and corrupt mankind
on earth to the uttermost. A task of mankind during the next phase of
civilization will be to live towards the incarnation of Ahriman with such alert
consciousness that this incarnation can actually serve to promote a higher,
spiritual development, inasmuch as through Ahriman himself man will become aware
of what can, or shall we say, can not be achieved by physical life alone.
But men must go forward with full consciousness towards this incarnation of
Ahriman and become more and more alert in every domain, in order to recognize
with greater and greater clarity those trends in life which are leading towards
this Ahrimanic incarnation. Men must learn from spiritual science to find the
key to life and so be able to recognize and learn to control the currents
leading towards the incarnation of Ahriman. It must be realized that Ahriman
will live among men on the earth, but that in confronting him men will
themselves determine what they may learn from him, what they may receive from
him. This, however, they will not be able to do unless, from now onwards, they
take control of certain spiritual and also unspiritual currents which otherwise
are used by Ahriman for the purpose of leaving mankind as deeply unconscious as
possible of his coming; then, one day, he will be able to appear on earth and
overwhelm men, tempting and luring them to repudiate earth-evolution, thus
preventing it from reaching its goal. To understand the whole process of which I
have been speaking, it is essential to recognize the character of certain
currents and influences — spiritual or the reverse.
Do you not see
the continually growing number of people at the present time who do not want any
science of the spirit, any knowledge of the spiritual? Do you not see how
numerous are the people to whom the old forces of religion no longer give any
inner stimulus? — Whether they go to church or not is a matter of complete
indifference to large numbers of human beings nowadays. The old religious
impulses mean nothing to them. But neither will they bring themselves to give a
thought to what can stream into our civilization as new spiritual life. They
resist it, reject it, regard it as folly, as something inconvenient; they will
not allow themselves to have anything to do with it. But, you see, man as he
lives on earth is veritably a unity. His spiritual nature cannot be separated
from his physical nature; both work together as a unity between birth and death.
And even if man does not receive the spiritual through his faculties of soul,
the spiritual takes effect, nevertheless. Since the last third of the nineteenth
century the spiritual has been streaming around us; it is streaming into earthly
evolution. The spiritual is there in very truth — only men are not willing to
receive it.
But even if they
do not accept the spiritual, it is there! And what becomes of it?
Paradoxical as it may seem — for much that is true seems paradoxical to the
modern mind — in those people who refuse the spiritual and like eating and
drinking best of all things in life, the spiritual streams, unconsciously, to
them, into the processes of eating and digestion. This is the secret of that
march into materialism which began about the year 1840, or rather was then in
active preparation. Those who do not receive the spiritual through their souls,
receive it today nonetheless: in eating and drinking they eat and drink the
spirit. They are “eaters” of the soul-and-spirit. And in this way the spirit
that is streaming into earth-evolution passes over into the Luciferic element,
is conveyed to Lucifer. Thereby the Luciferic power, which can then be of help to
the Ahrimanic power for its later incarnation, is constantly strengthened. This
must come to the knowledge of those who admit the fact that in the future men
will either receive spiritual knowledge consciously or consume the spirit
unconsciously, thereby delivering it into the hands of the Luciferic powers.
This stream of
spirit-and-soul consumption is particularly encouraged by Ahriman because in
this way he can lull mankind into greater and greater drowsiness, so that then,
through his incarnation, he will be able to come among men and fall upon them
unawares because they do not confront him consciously.
But Ahriman can
also make direct preparation for his incarnation, and he does so. Certainly, men
of our day also have a spiritual life, but it is purely intellectual,
unconnected with the spiritual world. This purely intellectual life is becoming
more and more widespread; at first it took effect mainly in the sciences, but
now it is leading to mischief of every kind in social life as well. What is the
essential character of this intellectual life?
This
intellectual life has very little to do with the true interests of men! I ask
you: How many teachers do you not see today, passing in and out of higher and
lower educational institutions without bringing any inner enthusiasm to their
science but pursuing it merely as a means of livelihood — in such cases the
interest of the soul is not directly linked with the actual pursuit. The same
thing happens even at school. Think how much is learned at the various stages of
life without any real enthusiasm or interest, how external the intellectual life
is becoming for many people who devote themselves to it! And how many there are
today who are forced to produce a mass of intellectual material which is then
preserved in libraries and, as spiritual life, is not truly alive!
Everything that
is developing as intellectual life without being suffused by warmth of soul,
without being quickened by enthusiasm, directly furthers the incarnation of
Ahriman in a way that is after his own heart. It lulls men to sleep in the way I
have described, so that its results are advantageous to Ahriman.
There are
numerous other currents in the spiritual or unspiritual life which Ahriman can
turn to his advantage. You have lately heard — and you are still hearing it —
that national states, national empires, must be founded. A great deal is said
about “freedom of the individual peoples.” But the time for founding empires
based on relationships of blood and race is past and over in the evolution of
mankind. If an appeal is made today to national, racial, and similar
relationships, to relationships arising out of the intellect and not out of the
spirit, then disharmony among mankind will be intensified. And it is this
disharmony among mankind which the Ahrimanic power can put to special use.
Chauvinism, perverted patriotism in every form — this is the material from which
Ahriman will build just what he needs.
But there are
other things as well. Everywhere today we see parties being formed for one
object or another. People nowadays have no discernment, nor do they desire to
have it, where party opinions and party programs are concerned. With
intellectual ingenuity, proof can be furnished in support of the most radically
opposing theories. Very clever arguments can be used to prove the soundness of
Leninism — but the same applies to directly contrary principles, and also to what
lies between the two extremes. An excellent case can be made out for every party
program — but the one who establishes the validity of the opposite program is
equally right. The intellectualism prevailing among men today is not capable of
demonstrating the inner potentialities and values of anything. It can furnish
proofs; but what is intellectually proved should not be regarded as of real
value or efficacy in life. Men oppose one another in parties because the
soundness of every party opinion — at any rate, the main party opinions — can be
proved with equal justification. Our intellect remains at the surface-layer of
understanding and does not penetrate to the deeper layer where the truth
actually lies. This, too, must be fundamentally and thoroughly understood.
People today
prefer to let their intellect remain on the surface and not to penetrate with
deeper forces to those levels where the essential nature of things is disclosed.
It is only necessary to look around a little, for even where it takes its most
external form, life often reveals the pitfalls of current predilections. People
love numbers and figures in science, but they also love figures in the social
sphere as well. Social science consists almost entirely of statistics. And from
statistics, that is to say from figures, the weightiest conclusions are reached.
Well, with figures too, anything can be proved and anything believed; for
figures are not a means whereby the essential reality of things can be proved —
they are simply a means of deception! Whenever one fails to look beyond figures
to the qualitative, they can be utterly deceptive.
The following is
an obvious example. There is, or at least there used to be, a great deal of
argument about the nationality of the Macedonians. In the political life of the
Balkan peninsula, much depended upon the statistics compiled there. The figures
are of just as much value as those contained in other statistics. Whether
statistics are compiled of wheat and rye production, or of the numbers of Greek,
Serbian, or Bulgarian nationals in Macedonia — in regard to what can be
proved by these means it is all the same. From the figures quoted for the
Greeks, for the Bulgarians, for the Serbians, very plausible conclusions can be
drawn. But one can also have an eye for the qualitative element, and then one
often finds it recorded that the father was Greek, one son was Bulgarian,
another was Serbian. — What is at the back of it you can puzzle out for
yourselves! — These statistics are taken as authoritative, whereas in this case
they were compiled solely in support of party aims. It stands to reason that if
the father is really a Greek, the two sons are also Greeks. But the procedure
adopted there is just an example of many other things that are done with
figures. Ahriman can achieve a great deal through figures and numbers used in
this way as evidence of proof.
A further means
of which Ahriman can avail himself is again one that will seem paradoxical. As
you know, we have been concerned in our movement to study the Gospels in the
light of spiritual science. But these deeper interpretations of the Gospels,
which are becoming more and more necessary in our time, are rejected on all
sides, just as spiritual science as a whole is rejected.
The people who
often profess humility in these matters — and they are insistent about it — are
actually the most arrogant of all. More and more generally it is being said that
people should steep themselves in the very simplicity of the Gospels and not
attempt to understand the Mystery of Golgotha by entering into the complexities
of spiritual science. Those who feign unpretentiousness in their study of the
Gospels are the most arrogant of all, for they despise the honest search for
knowledge demanded in spiritual science. So arrogant are they that they believe
the highest revelations of the spiritual world can be garnered without effort,
simply by browsing on the simplicity of the Gospels. What claims to be “humble”
or “simple” today is often supreme arrogance. In sects, in religious
confessions — it is there that the most arrogant of men are to be found.
It must be
remembered that the Gospels came into existence at a time when the Luciferic
wisdom still survived. In the first centuries of Christendom, men's
understanding of the Gospels was quite different from what it came to be in
later times. Today, people who cannot deepen their minds through spiritual
science merely pretend to understand the Gospels. In reality they have no idea
even of the original meaning of the words; for the translations that have been
made into the different languages are not faithful reproductions of the Gospels;
often they are scarcely even reminiscent of the original meaning of the words in
which the Gospels were composed.
Real
understanding of the intervention of the Christ Being in earthly evolution is
possible today only through spiritual science. Those who want to study, or
actually do study, the Gospels “without pretention” — as the saying goes — cannot
come to any inner realization of the Christ Being as He truly is, but only to an
illusory picture, or, at very most, a vision or hallucination of the Christ
Being. No real connection with the Christ Impulse can be achieved today merely
through reading the Gospels — but only a hallucinatory picture of the Christ.
Hence the prevalence of the theological view that the Christ was not present in
the man Jesus of Nazareth, who was simply a historical figure like Socrates or
Plato or others, although possibly more exalted. The “simple man of Nazareth” is
an ideal even to the theologians. And very few of them indeed can make anything
of an event like Paul's vision at the gate of Damascus, because without the
deepened knowledge yielded by spiritual science the Gospels can give rise only
to a hallucination of the Christ, not to vision of the real Christ. And so
Paul's vision at Damascus is also regarded as a hallucination.
Deeper
understanding of the Gospels in the light of spiritual science is essential
today, for the apathy that takes hold of people who are content to live merely
within the arms of the denominations will be used to the utmost by Ahriman in
order to achieve his goal — which is that his incarnation shall catch men
unawares. And those who believe they are being most truly Christian by rejecting
any development of the conception of the Christ Mystery are, in their
arrogance, the ones who do most to promote Ahriman's aims. The denominations and
sects are positively spheres of encouragement, breeding-grounds for Ahriman. It
is futile to gloss these things over with illusions. Just as the materialistic
attitude, rejecting the spiritual altogether and contending that man is a
product of what he eats and drinks, furthers Ahriman's aims, so are these aims
furthered by the stubborn rejection of everything spiritual and adherence to the
literal, “simple” conception of the Gospels.
You see, a
barrier which prevents the single Gospels from unduly circumscribing the human
mind has been erected through the fact that the Event of Golgotha is described
in the Gospels from four — seemingly contradictory — sides. Only a little
reflection will show that this is a protection from too literal a conception. In
sects, however, where one Gospel only is taken as the basis of the
teaching — and such sects are quite numerous — pitfalls, stupefaction, and
hallucination are generated. In their day, the Gospels were given as a necessary
counterweight to the Luciferic Gnosis; but if no attempt is made to develop
understanding of their content, the aims of Ahriman are furthered, not the
progress of mankind. In the absolute sense, nothing is good in itself, but is
always good or bad according to the use to which it is put. The best can be the
worst if wrongly used. Sublime though they are, the Gospels can also have the
opposite effect if men are too lazy to search for a deeper understanding based
on spiritual science.
Hence there is a
great deal in the spiritual and unspiritual currents of the present time of
which men should be acutely aware, and determine their attitude of soul
accordingly. Upon the ability and willingness to penetrate to the roots of such
matters will depend the effect which the incarnation of Ahriman can have upon
men, whether this incarnation will lead them to prevent the earth from reaching
its goal, or bring home to them the very limited significance of intellectual,
unspiritual life. If men rightly take in hand the currents leading towards
Ahriman, then simply through his incarnation in earthly life they will recognize
the Ahrimanic influence on the one side, and on the other its polar opposite —
the Luciferic influence. And then the very contrast between the Ahrimanic and
the Luciferic will enable them to perceive the third reality. Men must
consciously wrestle through to an understanding of this trinity of the Christian
impulse and the Ahrimanic and the Luciferic influences; for without this
consciousness they will not be able to go forward into the future with the
prospect of achieving the goal of earth-existence.
Spiritual
science must be taken in deep earnestness, for only so can it be rightly
understood. It is not the outcome of any sectarian whim but something that has
proceeded from the fundamental needs of human evolution. Those who recognize
these needs cannot choose between whether they will or will not endeavor to
foster spiritual science. On the contrary, they will say to themselves: The whole
physical and spiritual life of men must be illumined and pervaded by the
conceptions of spiritual science!
Just as once in
the East there was a Lucifer-incarnation, and then, at the mid-point, as it
were, of world-evolution, the incarnation of Christ, so in the West there will
be an incarnation of Ahriman.
This Ahrimanic
incarnation cannot be averted; it is inevitable, for men must confront Ahriman
face to face. He will be the individuality by whom it will be made clear to men
what indescribable cleverness can be developed if they call to their help all
that earthly forces can do to enhance cleverness and ingenuity. In the
catastrophes that will befall humanity in the near future, men will become
extremely inventive; many things discovered in the forces and substances of the
universe will be used to provide nourishment for man. But these very discoveries
will at the same time make it apparent that matter is connected with the organs
of intellect — not with the organs of the spirit, but of the intellect. People
will learn what to eat and drink in order to become really clever. Eating and
drinking cannot make them spiritual, but clever and astute, yes. Men have no
knowledge of these things as yet; but not only will they be striven for, they
will be the inevitable outcome of catastrophes looming in the near future. And
certain secret societies — where preparations are already in train — will apply
these things in such a way that the necessary conditions can be established for
an actual incarnation of Ahriman on the earth. This incarnation cannot be
averted, for men must realize during the time of the earth's existence just how
much can proceed from purely material processes! He must learn to bring under
his control those spiritual or unspiritual currents which are leading to
Ahriman.
Once it is
realized that conflicting party programs can be proved equally correct, our
attitude of soul will be that we do not set out to prove things, but rather to
experience them. For to experience a thing is a very different matter from
attempting to prove it intellectually.
Equally we shall
be convinced that deeper and deeper penetration of the Gospels is necessary
through spiritual science. The literal, word-for-word acceptance of the Gospels,
that is still so prevalent today, promotes Ahrimanic culture. Even on external
grounds it is obvious that a strictly literal acceptance of the Gospels is
unjustified. For as you know, what is good and right for one time is not right
for every other time. What is right for one epoch becomes Luciferic or Ahrimanic
when practiced in a later one. The mere reading of the Gospel texts has had its
day. What is essential now is to acquire a spiritual understanding of the
Mystery of Golgotha in the light of the truths enshrined in the Gospels. Many
people, of course, find these things disquieting; but those whose interest is
attracted by Anthroposophy must learn to realize that the levels of culture,
gradually piling one above the other, have created chaos, and that light must
penetrate again into this chaos.
It is
interesting nowadays to listen to someone whose views have become very extreme,
or to read about some burning question of the day, and then to listen to sermons
on the same subject given by a priest of some denomination who is still steeped
in the form of thought current in bygone times. There you face two worlds
which you cannot possibly confuse unless you avoid all attempts to get at the
root of these things. Listen to a modern socialist speaking about social
questions and then, immediately afterwards, to a Catholic preacher speaking
about the same questions. It is very interesting to find two levels of culture
existing side by side but using the words in an entirely different sense. The
same word has quite a different meaning in each case.
These things
should be seen in the light that will dawn if they are taken in the earnest
spirit we have been trying to convey. People belonging to definite religions do
also come, in the end, to long in their own way for spiritual deepening. It is
by no means without significance that a man as eminently spiritual as Cardinal
Newman, ardent Catholic though he was, should say at his investiture as Cardinal
in Rome that he could see no salvation for Christianity other than a new
revelation.
In effect, what
Cardinal Newman said was that he could see no salvation for Christianity other
than a new revelation! But he had not the courage to take a new spiritual
revelation seriously. And so it is with many others. You can read countless
treatises today about what is needed in social life. — Another book has
recently appeared: Socialism, by Robert Wilbrandt, the son of the poet.
In it the social question is discussed on the foundation of accurate and
detailed knowledge. And finally it is stated that without the spirit nothing is
achieved, that the very course of events shows that the spirit is necessary.
Yes, but what does such a man really achieve? He gets as far as to utter the
word “spirit,” to pronounce the abstract word “spirit”; but he refuses to
accept, indeed he rejects, anything that endeavors to make the spirit really
take effect.
For that, it is
essential above all to realize that wallowing in abstractions, however loud the
cry for the spirit, is not yet spiritual, not yet spirit! Vague, abstract
chattering about the spirit must never be confused with the active search for
the content of the spiritual world pursued in anthroposophical science.
Nowadays there
is much talk about the spirit. But you who accept spiritual science should not
be deluded by such chattering; you should perceive the difference between it and
the descriptions of the spiritual world attempted in Anthroposophy, where the
spiritual world is described as objectively as the physical world. You should
probe into these differences, reminding yourselves repeatedly that abstract talk
of the spirit is a deviation from sincere striving for the spirit and that, by
their very talk, people are actually removing themselves from the spirit. Purely
intellectual allusion to the spirit leads nowhere. — What, then, is
“intelligence”? What is the content of our human intelligence? I can best
explain this in the following way. — Imagine — and this will be better
understood by the many ladies present! — imagine yourself standing in front of a
mirror and looking into it. The picture presented to you by the mirror is
you, but it has no reality at all. It is nothing but a reflection. All
the intelligence within your soul, all the intellectual content, is only a
mirror-image; it has no reality. And just as your reflected image is called into
existence through the mirror, so what mirrors itself as intelligence is called
into existence through the physical apparatus of your body, through the brain.
Man is intelligent only because his body is there. And as little as you can
touch yourself by stretching your hand towards your reflected image, as little
can you lay hold of the spirit if you turn only to the intellectual — for the
spirit is not there! What is grasped through the intellect, ingenious as it may
be, never contains the spirit itself, but only a picture of the spirit. You
cannot truly experience the spirit if you get no further than mere intelligence.
The reason why intelligence is so seductive is that it yields a picture, a
reflected picture, of the spirit — but not the spirit itself. It seems
unnecessary to go to the inconvenience of penetrating to the spirit, because it
is there — or so, at least, one imagines. In reality it is only a reflected
picture — but for all that, it is not difficult to talk about the spirit.
To distinguish
the mere picture from the reality — that is the task of the tenor of soul which
does not merely theorize about spiritual science but has actual perception of
the spirit.
That is what I
wanted to say to you today in order to intensify the earnestness which should
pervade our whole attitude to the spiritual life as conceived by Anthroposophy.
For the evolution of humanity in the future will depend upon how truly this
attitude is adopted by men of the present day. If what I have characterized in
this lecture continues to be offered the reception that is still offered to it
today by the vast majority of people on the earth, then Ahriman will be an evil
guest when he comes. But if men are able to rouse themselves to take into their
consciousness what we have been studying, if they are able so to guide it that
humanity can freely confront the Ahrimanic influence, then, when Ahriman
appears, men will acquire, precisely through him, the power to realize that
although the earth must enter inevitably into its decline, mankind is lifted
above earthly existence through this very fact. When a man has reached a certain
age in physical life, his body begins to decline, but if he is sensible he makes
no complaint, knowing that together with his soul he is approaching a life that
does not run parallel with this physical decline. There lives in mankind
something that is not bound up with the already prevailing decline of the
physical earth but becomes more and more spiritual just because of this physical
decline.
Let us learn to
say frankly: Yes, the earth is in its decline, and human life, too, in respect
of its physical manifestation; but just because it is so, let us muster the
strength to draw into our civilization that element which, springing from
mankind itself, will live on while the earth is in decline, as the immortal
fruit of earth-evolution.
Source: http://wn.rsarchive.org/Lectures/GA191/English/SBC1976/19191104p02.html;mark=299,17,36#WN_mark'From
No comments:
Post a Comment