Wednesday, December 2, 2015

Lonesome Dove: The Gospel of Mark


Background to the Gospel of Mark. Lecture 4.

Rudolf Steiner, December 6, 1910:

From my book “Christianity as Mystical Fact” it can be gathered that the Gospels, when rightly understood, must be accepted in a very special way. As I intend to speak on the Gospels during this winter I would like to say that it is not possible for me always to begin again from the beginning for the sake of the younger members, so that there will certainly be much in these lectures that will be difficult of comprehension for younger members.
It has frequently been remarked on the occasion of the annual meeting how necessary it is that our younger members should take part in the courses of lectures, that these should be arranged so that early teachings are constantly repeated. May I say here something rather strange — it does not seem practical that the younger members should work so very energetically at going over the beginnings of  theosophical life. In that case it might happen that the higher realms of spiritual science were incomprehensible to them, and they might for this reason form strange opinions as to what spiritual science is. This is, however, a matter for the individual member.
I showed in the book mentioned above that we have to accept the Gospels as “books of initiation.” This means that they are nothing less than accounts of the ancient ritual of initiation, paraphrased in a certain way. What is stated in these ancient writings? They mainly contain accounts of how the candidate in his training was led step by step along the path to higher worlds. How he gradually went through certain soul experiences and was finally brought to the point where certain forces slumbering in his soul were awakened. We read how higher stages gradually evolved out of lower ones, up to that stage when the spiritual world dawned within the soul of the would-be initiate and the secrets of the spiritual world were revealed to him. He could then look into the spiritual world. He could behold, for example, the beings of the different hierarchies as we have described them in other connections on many occasions. Thus the content of such “books of initiation” was what anyone seeking initiation had to carry out.
In studying pre-Christian ages we find that many persons passed through initiation in different centers of the Mysteries; that this was not always exactly the same in form, though similar in character, that the stages were introduced one by one up to the point where the person seeking initiation could see into the spiritual world, where the beings of the hierarchies appeared before him spiritually — that is, in a different way to a physical appearance.
This was how it was in pre-Christian times. What meaning for Christianity had these initiations into the ancient Mysteries? What was their significancein regards to the Christ Impulse? Their significance was that a being, outwardly visible on the physical plane and known as “Jesus of Nazareth,” disclosed the secrets of the spiritual world in a way that was not customary, in a way not in accordance with the methods of pre-Christian times. An individual initiated in accordance with ancient ritual (when the events just described had taken place in his soul) could come before men and speak of the secrets of the spiritual kingdoms. But in the case of Christ Jesus something was present by which this personality, Jesus of Nazareth, could speak of these hidden matters without having been led to them in the ancient customary manner.
Jesus of Nazareth had been led to them through what is called the baptism in Jordan. The Spirit of Christ then entered into him. From this moment — that is, from the moment of an historic event when the person of Christ Jesus was initiated in so open a way — the Spirit of Christ spoke to the people around Him of the Mysteries of the spiritual realms, but in a higher way than had been done before. Something had therefore been accomplished on the physical plane, open for all the world to see, which formerly had been attainable — and to a certain extent only — by initiates in the depths of the Mysteries, so that they might then go forth and speak of these mysteries to their fellow men. To put the matter pictorially we might say: We look back to the ancient temple of the Mysteries, we see the heirophant performing the rites of initiation, so that the person initiated can look into the spiritual world, and can then go forth and teach others of this world. This had always been carried out gradually and in the secret depths of the temple. Any talk of such things in the world outside the Mysteries, any talk concerning the spiritual world, was an utter impossibility. But now, what had often taken place in the depths of the Mysteries had been transferred to the outer world, it took place in Palestine. There it was enacted as a historic fact, as the development of Jesus of Nazareth; it was enacted historically in the Mystery of Golgotha. And we have to accept this Mystery, set forth as it was historically before all the world, as forming the link between the Mystery of Golgotha and those ancient temple-Mysteries of the past.
Writings descriptive of initiation, though dealing in essence with the same stages of development, differed in certain particulars in different parts of the Earth, and were suited to the differences in human individuals according to space and time. Knowing this, let us endeavor to enter into the soul of one of those, generally called Evangelists, who concerned themselves with the writing of our Gospels. These men, through their own occult schooling, had some knowledge of the initiation literature of the various peoples and Mysteries. They knew what men had to pass through before it was possible for them to speak of the secrets of spiritual realms and spiritual hierarchies. And now through the events that had occurred in Palestine, and through the Mystery of Golgotha, they were aware that what formerly had only been seen by initiates in the temple of the Mysteries had been enacted openly on the plane of history before all the world, and that it would henceforth enter ever more and more deeply into the minds and souls of men.
The Evangelists were not biographers in the ordinary sense of the word, when things are written which really do not concern the world, and which no one requires to know about any actively creative personality. They were not biographers like those who ferret out each private concern of the person they write of, but they were biographers in so far as they described the life of Christ by saying: “Something happened at a certain time to Jesus of Nazareth, into whom the Christ entered, which we have seen happen again and again in the Mysteries; but there it was not compressed as a historical event into a few short years; here, on the contrary, it has become an event of history, yet is at the same time a repetition of temple ritual; we can therefore describe this life by describing the different stages formerly passed through during initiation.”
Thus we have to regard the Gospels as books of instructions concerning initiation. In them are found again the ancient directions for initiation, but so that we are shown in a certain way the reason why that which formerly occurred in the depths of the Mysteries now emerges on to the great plane of history. The Evangelist who begins his Gospel by stating the reason for this, who tells from the beginning why he is in a position to write of a historic event which, transformed into something greater, fulfills the instructions given for initiation, is the writer of the Gospel according to Mark. He tells from the first how man has evolved so that this great fact of the removal of initiation from the secret depth of the temples and the setting of it openly on the plane of history might come to pass. He tells us from the beginning that this is connected with an event of immeasurably great importance to human evolution; an event foretold by the Hebrew prophets. For what occurred in Palestine as the Mystery of Golgotha had been seen and spoken of prophetically by Hebrew initiates and prophets.
If we try to enter into the soul of such a man as the prophet Isaiah, with whose words the Gospel according to Mark begins, we find that he declares somewhat as follows: A time will come when the souls of men will perceive differently than they do now; this time is now being prepared for. (Isaiah refers here to his own day.) What is it he wishes to tell us? You know that the Gospel according to Mark begins with the introduction of a mighty saying of this prophet. You know the words well, and how they are employed. I make use here of the ordinary translation of C. Weizsäcker: —
Behold I send my messenger before thee, he shall prepare thy way. Hark to the cry in the wilderness: Make ready the way of the Lord. Make his path straight.
Thus, it is fairly well translated in our Gospel literature. The prophet refers in these words to the greatest event in history — to the Mystery of Golgotha.
You know that in our studies of the other Gospels great trouble has been taken to translate important passages in a comprehensible way. What matters most in this is not the giving of a correct verbal translation according to the dictionary, but in choosing words that reproduce the deep significance of the original and convey this to us in our own language; not only in presenting them theoretically to our understanding, but so that the whole feeling that accompanied the peculiar quality of the language of that day is also passed on to us. For speech at that time was totally different from the present manner of speech. I would like to impress this fact on you, that speech was then not so abstract, so trivial, as it is today.
The whole manner of expressing anything was such that an ever deeper meaning, a richer significance and feeling-content, was imparted to the listener along with the actual words, yet he knew most unmistakably what this feeling-content was. A whole WORLD was then heard in the spoken word compared with what is ordinarily heard today. This is a special quality of the Hebrew tongue; it is exceedingly rich in this power of concealing a very great deal behind the words, because the images employed were taken altogether from the sense-world. Expressions such as “prepare the way” or “make straight the path” are pictures drawn from the sense-world. It is as if the path were prepared with spades and shovels. But when such words were used, the peculiarity of this language compared with others was that behind the expressions employed to denote outward things, a whole spiritual world stood — it stood there so clearly and incontestably that no one could interpret it to their own liking, as is so often done with poetry, where all kinds of things are sometimes read into it. The reason for this was that in the ancient Hebrew language, in the personal use of the language, which cannot be shown in the script, it was possible for whole hidden worlds to be given in the tone. A feeling for such secret things existed.
In Greek, the language of the Gospel text, this is not nearly so much the case. All the same it was still possible, without occult knowledge, to obtain far better translations from the Greek than from the language used by the Evangelists.
As a matter of fact, one translator has merely copied another in this without going into the matter philologically or proving how the original compared with the Greek text. I will give you later a single example of how great were the errors that arose through this. Today I will not interrupt the course of our studies, but will try, not philologically but with the help of what can be learnt through spiritual investigations, to put before you some important things concerning the beginning of the Gospel of Mark.
I will start with this important passage from the prophecies of Isaiah, wherein he tries to show what is to come to pass through the Event of Palestine, so that you may discover through your feeling what it means.
The Greek text is as follows:
Greek Text
We must in the first place clearly understand that the word messenger or angel was only used in olden times in the sense employed by us when describing the hierarchies, that is when we describe those beings who stand immediately above man in the ranks of the hierarchies. We must feel when we read the words “his angel” that a being belonging to this realm is meant. If this is not felt then the meaning of the whole passage is lost. Spiritual science alone can provide a foundation for such an understanding, and also for all it has to tell us about the Christ Event.
What is the fact of greatest importance in the Christ Impulse? The fact that through it full consciousness first entered the human soul so that a place might be prepared there for a self-conscious ego. So that there might gradually arise within this self-consciousness ego in the further course of earthly evolution all the secret things (Geheimnisse) which formerly arose by a kind of natural clairvoyance within the astral body.
The present epoch was preceded by one in which men still carried over with them into post-Atlantean culture a natural clairvoyance which enabled them to look into the spiritual world. In certain abnormal conditions of soul the secrets of the spiritual world still poured down into men, and they were able to look up to the hierarchies. They naturally saw more often, and for a longer period, the hierarchy which stands nearest to man — the hierarchy of angels. They saw them as the beings standing immediately above man. In the time of this ancient clairvoyance men were not aware that they possessed something within them that was to lead them to the spiritual world. They looked on it as a grace accorded to them from without, as something granted to their souls by spiritual powers. Therefore the prophets looking to the future could speak as follows: “A time is coming when man will be aware of his ego; he will then know that it is through the self-conscious ego that the secrets of the spiritual world will come to him.” All this was to come. A time was to come in which man would say: “When I have my ego in me, I shall be able, through the power it brings, to penetrate to the secrets of the spiritual world.” This had, however, first to be prepared for.
Thus man, who is as it were the lowest of the hierarchies, had to he prepared for what he was to become by being equipped with something which as yet he did not possess. The messenger, or angel, announced that man would become an ego-being in the fullest sense of the word. While the mission of former angels had been to reveal to man the spiritual world, a special angel was now to receive a special mission. This angel was to carry revelation a stage further, and make known to man that he was to enter consciously into his ego, while the revelations of former angels had not been suited to a self-conscious ego.
So Isaiah announces: “The age of the Mystery of the Ego is to come, and from among the host of angels one will be specially chosen to declare to you this Mystery!” Only in this way can we understand what is meant when it says that the messenger or angel was sent before. Before whom was the messenger sent? He was sent beforehand to those who were to attain their self-conscious ego, and was to come as a being from the hierarchy of angels. No angel had as yet announced generally to men that it was foretold they were to receive a self-conscious ego. So this messenger of whom the prophet Isaiah spoke came to tell them to prepare themselves inwardly, to create within their souls a place for the ego, to prepare for the full validity of the ego. What is most important in this passage is the reference to the great change in the evolution of the human soul: whereas formerly men had to go out of themselves in order to enter the spiritual world, from this time onwards they could continue within their ego, and could, through it, discover the secrets of that world.
Let us now compare a soul of olden times with one from the time when the Christ Impulse was drawing near; picture a man of the earlier pre-Christian centuries. If wishing to enter the spiritual world he could not to do so and maintain his self-consciousness, however highly he was developed. To do this he had to divest himself of his self-consciousness, had to pass into an unconscious condition; he had to rise into the world of the hierarchies — the world of the spirit. His consciousness was lowered. This was an old feeling belonging to pre-Christian times. What then was the position of a man who did not altogether belong to the age when it was natural for him, on the withdrawal of self-consciousness, to find himself in the spiritual world, and what was the position of the man who did not live at a time when humanity was at the stage when his ego could be developed? The ego existed already in Atlantean times, but complete certainty that the greatest mystery of the spiritual world could well up within it came first to man through the Impulse of Christ. This was the feeling that caused men in the days of the old initiation to say: “When I desire to enter the spiritual world and learn what these worlds can reveal to me, I have to suppress a certain part of me and stimulate and bring life to another part of my soul.” What had to be suppressed? And what had to be made especially alive? That part of his soul which was gradually to develop into the “I” had to be suppressed; this is what had to become darker, heavier. It could retain no memory. It had to become void and empty. On the other hand the astral body, the body which can give a certain degree of clairvoyance, had to be specially stimulated. When this happened ancient clairvoyant powers of perception entered the astral body.
I have said that the ego was already present to a certain extent, but man could not make use of it when he desired to investigate the secrets of the spiritual world. The ego had in this case to be suppressed and the astral body stimulated. This stimulation of the astral body had become ever more and more impossible. In ancient times suppression of the ego and stimulation of the astral body so that the secrets of the spiritual world could pour into it was something that belonged to the elemental attributes of man. Advance in evolution consisted in the increasing incapacity of the astral body to receive the secrets of the spiritual world. At this stage men acknowledged: “My astral body will become ever less able to attain what once was mine through the old form of clairvoyance; my ego also will cease to pass out of me in the way it was wont to do, and as yet it is unable to rise to anything of itself.” The most gifted clairvoyant was at most aware of something empty, something void, within his soul. Such was the ego to which as yet no impulse had been imparted. At the same time men were aware it was not possible for them to enter the spiritual world through the ego.
From this you can gather what was the soul-attitude of those who desired to look into the spiritual realms at the time when the Christ Impulse was approaching. They might have said: “I can no longer develop in my astral body what formerly it was possible to develop; and no impulse has yet come to my ego; my soul is chaotic; I feel unable to rise to the spiritual world.”
Then as the time for the coming of the Christ Impulse drew near, certain methods were employed —  men underwent a certain training — with the result that they made the acquaintance of those who were not as yet filled with the spirit. When seeking entrance into higher worlds they were told: “Realize that thou canst not rise to these worlds through thy astral body; thou must first of all enter that inward place where thou feelest thyself as man, where thou art no longer conscious of the smallest connection with the outer world.”
This was how men felt as the time for the coming of the Christ Impulse drew near. Everyone who  sought for initiation realized that his astral body was no longer fitted to be the means for his entrance into the spiritual world — that the time for this was past — and that the ego was not as yet ready for it. But those who desired to receive the Impulse, who longed to leave the body and penetrate to spiritual worlds, divined (more than divine they could not) that there was something in them that strove with all its might toward that spiritual Impulse. This soul experience, which all passed through who sought at that time the path to spiritual illumination, was called “the path of loneliness.” What, then, had the messenger to do who prepared the way for the Christ Event? He had to tell those who desired to know of the approaching Impulse about “the path of loneliness.” He had to know loneliness fundamentally. He had to be the preacher of this loneliness of soul. You will come to know, as you study the Gospel of Mark further, that in certain cases great spiritual beings through whom some important advance in human evolution was to be carried out found the instruments they required in living men, and that they entered into them so as to live within a soul in bodily incarnation. The “messenger” spoken of by Isaiah, who must not be accepted as a man quite in the ordinary sense, took possession of the soul of the reincarnated Elias, lived in him and announced the approach of the Christ Impulse. It was this messenger who spoke from the soul of John the Baptist. Whence came this voice? It sprang from what I have just described as a great loneliness of soul. We read of this in the Gospel according to Mark: it says: “Listen to the cry of soul-loneliness.” The Greek word “ὲν τη ὲφήμω” should not be translated in a symbolic sense by “wilderness,” thus giving them an external meaning. In these words an image is presented to us by which the whole spiritual world may be grasped. Their real meaning is “in loneliness.”
To understand this expression better, we must occupy ourselves a little with the true meaning of what is felt by the word “κνφιος” or Lord, as it is usually translated in the lines “prepare the way of the Lord.” The true meaning is something we can still divine in the Greek, and is confirmed when we associate it with ancient tradition. In ancient usage this word had not the trivial meaning it has today.
In this materialistic age man has become a great philistine in respect of language. Words are no longer “the bodies of soul-beings,” so that it is possible to sense a whole world in them.
What was felt in the Greek word “κνφιος” or Lord when spoken in the connection I have indicated? Men felt that it was an image of what went on within them, of what they sensed was happening in their soul life. The uprising of the “I am” from the depths of the soul was felt as the coming of the “Lord” and “Ruler,” he who regulated and ordered the soul-forces, and is used in the sense employed today when we say the various soul forces possessed by man — thinking, feeling, and willing — are the servants of his soul. But within the soul there is a master, the ego.
This is shown by the fact that whereas in old times men said “it thinks,” and in respect of feeling and willing “it feels,” “it wills within me,”men now say when the ego, the Lord of the soul forces, is in command and the mighty change in human evolution is felt: “I think,” “I feel,” “I will.” In earlier days the soul was to a certain extent unconscious, it was imprisoned and submerged within the forces that served it. But now the ego, the Lord of the soul forces, was to be born! The cry went forth: “He who is Lord of the soul is coming!” No person or being is meant by these words, but only the emergence of the ego as “Lord” of the soul.
This was taught in the temples, where preparation was made for what was to come to pass in human nature. With holy reverence and deep humility it was made known: For a time the condition of souls was such that they had in them only the serving powers of thinking, feeling, and willing; but now the “Ruler” was to be born.
This mighty fact is now proceeding; its development will go slowly on until the end of the Earth-age, when it will have gained ever more and more power. Yes, this will come to pass! And it is the Christ who gives the first impulse to this development. This is the “Great Hour,” the turning point of the world's time-piece, the hour when Christ lived on Earth. The hands of the world clock now point to the moment of the coming of the ego. As Lord of the forces of the soul, it now begins to evolve ever greater power, and will have reached its goal when the Earth perishes and man passes on to still higher stages of development.
It is only when we try to feel as people must have felt in those early days, that it is possible for us to form some idea of what Isaiah desired to say, and John the Baptist to repeat. Isaiah referred to the great event that was to take place within the souls of men, and to the course of the further development of these souls. But then we must not translate the word “λνφιοσ,” as “straight” as is usually done, nor as “level,” but as “open,” so that the road could be used.
It is then the “Lord” comes; he takes his way toward the human soul. But man must do something  so that he can really take possession of the soul. The way must be made free, open. In short, if we translate this passage so that it means something, and if at the same time we hold to tradition, it must be done somewhat as follows:
Take heed, [ 1 ] I send my angel before the ego in thee; he shall prepare the direction (Richtung).
Hark to the cry in the (soul's) loneliness (the cry of longing for the Lord of the soul): prepare the direction for the (soul's) ruler; work that the way be open for him.
In this form of words you have approximately an idea of what can be felt in the words of Isaiah. These words, or their content, was carried over by the angel into the soul of the Baptist. Why could the angel do this? To answer this question we must consider for a little the nature and method of the initiation of John the Baptist, and how this initiation affected his soul.
From former lectures you know that a man can either be initiated by descending into his own soul or by going forth from his soul, by liberation from the body and uniting his soul forces with the cosmos. These two paths were followed by different peoples in the most varied manner. When a man desired to pour out his soul into the macrocosm, the twelve stages through which he had to pass to attain to this were “marked” by the twelve signs of the Zodiac; for his soul had to expand in certain clearly defined directions of the macrocosm. Now, a very great deal was already attained — something important, that is, for the historical evolution of the world — when any soul had evolved so far as to be able to receive into it all the macrocosmic forces springing from those hidden things which are the meaning of each of the constellations. As a rule the ancient rites of initiations were conducted so that the soul expansion of one initiate was directed to the macrocosmic secret, say of Capricorn, another to those of Cancer, of the Scales, and so on. I have explained on other occasions that there are twelve different possible ways of expansion into the macrocosm, and that these are indicated symbolically by the twelve signs of the Zodiac. Anyone attaining initiation through expansion of his soul into the macrocosm, and who does not attain at once to the highest — the Sun initiation — but only to a partial initiation, would have his soul vision directed to the mysteries connected with some special constellation. To attain this he would have to turn his gaze away from everything of a material nature. This means, care would have to be taken that his gaze was directed, either through the rites of the Mysteries, or through John the Baptist by “Grace from above,” in such a way that he would have the Earth between him and the special constellation. In other words, his glance had to be directed at night to the constellation through the Earth. When a constellation is seen with physical eyes it is the physical constellation that is seen. But when a man's gaze can penetrate the substance of the Earth, which is between him and the physical constellation, he does not see the physical but the spiritual part of the Earth; that is, he sees the mysteries (Geheimnesse) which the constellation expresses.
The training that John the Baptist had passed through had made it possible for him to gaze at night through the material Earth upon the constellation Aquarius, the Waterman. He had received therefore (after the angel had entered into his soul) the initiation of Aquarius. Thus, through all he knew and had felt, John the Baptist was able to put himself in touch with the faculties of the angel, so that through this being he could make the content of the “Waterman initiation” known; and the information he gave respecting this was: that the lordship of the ego, the “Lord,” would enter men's souls. This is what the initiation of the Waterman gave.
But simultaneously the Baptist declared that the time had now come when a change was to take place in this initiation: it was to be replaced by another, one by which men would be able to understand the approaching lordship of the ego. Therefore he said to his disciples: “I am he who through the initiation of the Waterman has all the powers of his angel at his disposal. But after me ONE will come who has at his command all the subsequent powers of his angel!”
If you advance by day toward the Sun from the constellation of Ares, through that of the Bull, the Twins, and so on to Virgo, you must advance at night from the direction of the Waterman (Aquarius) to the constellation of the Fishes, that is, you must advance in the direction of the spiritual Sun. John had received the Waterman-initiation, and he pointed out that he who was to come after him would be an initiate of Piscis, the initiation which follows on the initiation passed through by John, and was therefore of a higher order. The Baptist told his intimate disciples: “Through the initiation of Aquarius I have only those powers at my disposal by which I can announce through my angel that the Lord — the ruler — is coming, but after me One will come who has powers symbolized by the initiation of the sign of the Fishes. Into him the Christ will enter!”
In these words John the Baptist refers to Jesus of Nazareth. Ancient tradition has on this account assigned to Christ Jesus the symbol of the Fish; and as everything that occurs outwardly is symbolic of inward events — though these may occur outwardly — the helpers appointed to Him were fishermen. This is an external historic fact; at the same time as regards spiritual secrets it is profoundly symbolic. John declared “a higher initiation is to come to humanity,” and he described himself as a “Waterman.” This is absolutely clear. But we must learn to see ever more clearly how the images employed to express the hidden things of men are at the same time connected with astronomical and cosmic mysteries.
“I have baptised you with water,” said John. Water baptism was specially the baptism within the power of those who had received from heaven the initiation of the “Waterman.” But in that the spiritual Sun progresses in the opposite direction to the physical Sun, which advances from the sign of the Virgin to that of the Scales, the spiritual Sun (as in the advance from John the Baptist to Jesus of Nazareth) progresses from the Waterman to the Fishes. And were anyone to appear in the world having experienced the initiation of the Fishes and able therefore to receive into him those spiritual forces, those spiritual impulses, which are the instruments of the Fish initiation, then it would be possible for him to baptize not only as John did with water, but to baptize in the higher sense described by John as the Baptism of the Holy Spirit.
In this lecture I have put before you in a certain way a twofold conception: Firstly, I have shown that in the Gospel according to Mark facts of human evolution, historical events, are dealt with in which mention is made of a higher power, of an “angelic,” not a human power; and that this power spoke through John the Baptist. On the other hand I have shown that in the accounts given here reference is made to heavenly events; namely, to the progress of the spiritual Sun from the sign of the Waterman to that of the Fishes. Indeed the Gospel according to Mark contains in every verse something which can only be read aright when in the sequence of the words we keep before us both their human and their cosmic, astronomical meaning, and when we realize that something lives in man the true significance of which is only to be found in heaven. Only when this is done can the connection between the mysteries of the cosmos and the mysteries of human nature be more clearly understood. Today, at the close of my lecture, I can but hint at what lies behind such things. I merely wished today to give you some premonitions of what lies in this direction. For we shall have to dive to very great depths in studying the Gospel of Mark, and you will have to ponder long and deeply if you are to attain to something more than “premonitions.” In what follows I will try to make clear to you the way this Gospel has to be read.
You all know the rainbow. To a child it appears as something real in the firmament. Until explained to him, he believes he can grasp it with his hands. Later, man learns that the rainbow does not depend on itself, but that it only appears when rain and sunshine stand related to each other in a certain way; when this relationship is changed it disappears. Thus it is not a reality; it is but an illusion. The realities as regards the rainbow are rain and sunshine.
If anyone has made a little progress on the path of occult development something is revealed to him which quite of himself he compares with the rainbow. Of this he says: It is actually not true, it is but an appearance held together by things outside it. Do you know what this “appearance” is? It is man himself!
Man is only an appearance, a semblance, and if with his physical senses he regards himself as reality, he has given himself over to illusion — to maya, the great “Non est.” For the word “maya” is compounded of “Mahat aya.” (Mahat = great, ya = being, and a = not); signifying the great non-being. On the path of occult development man reaches a point where he compares himself with something resembling a rainbow; he realizes he is but a semblance, a delusion, and that everything that is perceived by the senses is delusion also. The Sun as physical globe is a delusion. What physical science describes as a ball of gas in space is quite correct for practical purposes, but anyone who regards this as reality is giving himself over to delusion — to maya. The truth regarding the Sun is that it is a meeting-place of the spiritual hierarchies, whose deeds are expressed in warmth and light, and who approach us in the warmth and light of the Sun. The warmth and light we perceive is illusion. All appearance is illusion.
A man thinks he has a heart in his breast, but this heart is a delusion, nothing more. It is like the rings we see around street lamps on a misty autumn evening. These rings are not reality, but are produced by clearly defined forces. So is the human heart. You can perceive this in the following way. Suppose that this circle I have drawn represents the vault of the heavens: one kind of force streams into us from one side, other forces from other sides; these forces split up here in the center where I have drawn a small circle.
Nothing of the forces that stream into man from heaven and split up there (sich schneiden) really exist where he thinks they do, in his heart. Think everything else away except the forces that meet in you, as light meets in the rainbow — what remains is the human heart. It is the same with our other organs: they are fragments of forces (Schnittkräfte) caused by the breaking up of world forces.
When you move from one place to another you say “There is an impulse in me to move from here  to there.” In saying this you say something that appertains to maya. Why? Because forces come from the macrocosm, which are split up down here (sich schneiden), and these broken-up fragments give rise to illusion concerning the power and direction in walking. The results met with down here are but fragments of cosmic forces. If we desire to know the truth we must ask: What takes place in the macrocosm? What do cosmic forces bring about, both the upper and the lower? They bring that about in us that makes it appear as if we had a heart, a liver, etc., or that has such an appearance that we say: I walk from here to there. If the truth regarding this were to be described, we would have to describe cosmic forces.
If we wish to describe what John the Baptist did when he baptized, we must describe what the macrocosm — that is, the forces represented by the sign of the Waterman — charged him to do. This was determined at one time within the great cosmic lodge, and the forces necessary for it were sent down into John. It is thus in the language of the cosmos we must read what took place at a certain point of time. It was thus the writer of the Gospel according to Mark read the heavenly events corresponding with the earthly events that occurred in Palestine. He describes astronomical occurrences when he says: “Understand what I have to say to you in this way: suppose there is here a wall on which visible shadows play. If you wish to know the real cause of these shadows you must consider the things of which they are the reflections. I describe what took place at Jordan; all the same they are but the instruments of something else; in reality I am describing what was brought about on Earth through the astronomical forces of the macrocosm!”
The writer of the Gospel of Mark describes cosmic forces. He describes the shadow-pictures or projections thrown by mighty macrocosmic events onto the screen provided by the small district of Palestine. We must realize this clearly if we are to enter into the full greatness and importance of the document we call the Gospel of Mark; but we must first try to form something of the nature of a divination of what it is that is here presented to us. We must endeavor to understand what it is we are told in the beginning of the Gospel. The prophet Isaiah had foretold that the Lord of the soul forces of mankind would come, that in John the Baptist the “messenger” would dwell, who would prepare man for the reception of this ruler of his soul forces. This messenger had first to take as his dwelling place the body of one who had passed through the initiation of the Waterman, who was able therefore to lead men on the path that is connected on Earth with such an individuality as Jesus of Nazareth, one who because he had received the Fish initiation had prepared himself for the reception of the Christ.
All the events that take place on Earth are the reflections of cosmic events, and are connected with cosmic conditions in the same way as the rainbow is connected with rain and sunshine; and as, if we wish to describe the rainbow, we must study rain and sunshine, if we wish to know what was in the heart of John the Baptist or of Jesus of Nazareth, in whom the Christ dwelt, we must study cosmic conditions. So far as man is concerned, the whole world is explained by what took place in Palestine and on Golgotha. He who does not read the Gospel of Mark otherwise than merely as a document, which provides him with groups of letters descriptive of great world events is on a level with one who says: “Here I have one group of lines and strokes, there another” — he has no conception of what is referred to in the word “Lord,” but thinks only of the black letters. It is mostly in this way that the Gospel of Mark is read in our day. For what is told in it is but the outer lettering of what it really contains. To understand this Gospel we must rise to the level of those things to which, as in a shadowy reproduction, the events in Palestine refer.
Try to get at the meaning of the words: “Earthly events are the shadows of macrocosmic events.” When you have done this you will have taken the first step in the understanding of one of the greatest documents in the world — the Gospel according to St. Mark.


Notes:
1. “Behold” is no longer correct.



Source: http://wn.rsarchive.org/Lectures/GA/GA0124/19101206p01.html

Our Task


Rudolf Steiner:  "Our task is to take the knowledge bestowed by the gods on human beings in earlier days and brought down as a stimulus to our thought, and to offer it up again at the altars of the gods."



“Our task is to harvest from the mortal world fruits for the immortal.”
– Rudolf Steiner



Tuesday, December 1, 2015

The Christ Impulse and the evolution of knowledge

 
Background to the Gospel of Mark. Lecture 3.
Rudolf Steiner, November 7, 1910:


We have often spoken of  that period of human evolution that has passed since the Atlantean catastrophe. We have dealt with the various epochs of this evolution — the original Indian, original Persian, Egypto-Chaldean and Greco-Latin — and then with our own, the fifth epoch of post-Atlantean civilization. We have also shown that two further epochs will pass before the coming of another great catastrophe, so that we have to reckon in all seven such epochs of earthly humanity.
It is comprehensible that these epochs should be described differently. For as men of the present day we desire to find how we stand as regards our own mission, we can only gain some idea of what lies before us in the future when we know how far we have participated in these different epochs in the past.
I have often explained how we can distinguish between the separate human being, the little world, or microcosm, and the great world, or macrocosm; I have shown how man, the little cosmos, is a copy of the great world or macrocosm. Though this is a truth, yet it is a very abstract truth, and as generally stated does not mean very much. You will therefore find it helpful if we go into particulars regarding this, and show how certain things met with in mankind have really to be accepted as a little world, and can be compared with another, a greater world.
The man of the present day really belongs to all seven ages of the post-Atlantean epoch. We  have passed through all the earlier ages in former incarnations, and will pass through all the later ages in later ones. In each incarnation we receive what the age in question has to give. Because we receive this we bear within us, in a certain sense, the fruits of former evolutions, and the most intimate things within us are really those we have acquired during the ages mentioned. What each of us has acquired in the course of these ages is more or less within human consciousness today; while what we acquired generally in our Atlantean incarnations, when the state of consciousness was very different, has sunk more or less into our subconsciousness, and no longer reverberates within us as that does which we have acquired in post-Atlantean times. In Atlantean times man was more shielded from having his evolution injured in one way or another, because his consciousness was not then so awake as it was in post-Atlantean times. For this reason all we bear within us as the fruits of our Atlantean evolution is more in accordance with the ordering of the world than is that which had its origin in an age when we were already capable of bringing certain things in us into disorder. Ahrimanic and Luciferic beings certainly influenced man in Atlantean times, but they then worked quite differently, for man was not then capable of shielding himself from them.
That men grew ever more and more conscious is the most important fact of post-Atlantean culture. In this respect human evolution from the Atlantean catastrophe until the next great catastrophe is macrocosmic. Humanity evolves like one great man throughout the seven post-Atlantean periods; and the most important things that were to arise in human consciousness during these seven periods resemble what a single individual experiences in the seven periods of his individual life.
The different ages in the life of a man have been described as follows: The first seven years, from birth to the change of teeth, is described as the first age. In it man's physical body receives its form, is endowed with it as a gift. With the coming of the second teeth this form, in all its essentials, is fixed. The man then continues to grow within this form, which has received its essential direction. What is accomplished during the first seven years is the construction of the form. This period has to be understood from all sides. We must, for instance, distinguish the first teeth, which the child develops early and which fall out, from the second teeth which replace them. These two kinds of teeth, with respect to the laws of the body, are quite different — the first are inherited, they appear as the fruits of the organisms of the man's ancestors, but the second teeth appear as the outcome of the laws of the man's own physical being! This has to be realized. It is only when we go into such particulars that we observe this difference. We receive our first teeth because our ancestors pass them on to us with our organism; we acquire our second teeth because our own physical organism is so constituted that we acquire them through it. In the first period the teeth are directly bequeathed, in the second the physical organism is bequeathed, and it produces the second teeth.
After this we distinguish a second period of life, that from the change of teeth until puberty, to about the 14th or 15th year. What is significant in it is the development of the etheric body. The third period, to about the 21st year, represents the development of the astral body. Then follows the development of the ego, and this progresses from the development of the sentient soul to that of the rational soul and on to the consciousness soul. It is thus we distinguish the different ages in the life of a man. In this life, as you know well, only that period is really ordered and regulated which falls within the first seven years. This is, and must be so, as regards the man of the present day. Such regular differentiations as we find in the first three periods of a man's life do not occur later; neither is the time they last so clearly defined. If we enquire into the causes of this we have to understand that in the evolution of the world a middle period always comes after the first three of any seven periods.
We are living at present in the post-Atlantean age; we have already within us the fruits of the first three periods, and of the fourth, for we are now in the fifth post-Atlantean age, and are living on toward the sixth.
We are entirely justified in finding a resemblance between the evolution of the various post-Atlantean periods and that of the ages in the life of separate individuals, so that here also it is possible to distinguish between what is macrocosmic and what is microcosmic.
Let us take that which is most characteristic of the first post-Atlantean period, the one we call the Old-Indian; for in this the character of the post-Atlantean evolution was most strongly expressed. In this first period an exalted and most clearly differentiated wisdom existed, a primeval wisdom. What was taught in India by the Seven Holy Rishis was in principle the same as was actually beheld in the spiritual world by natural seers, and also by a large part of the people at that time. This ancient wisdom was present in the first Indian period as an inheritance. It was experienced clairvoyantly in Atlantean times, but now it had become more of an inherited primeval wisdom, preserved and given out again by those who, like the Rishis, had risen to spiritual worlds by initiation. What had entered thus into human consciousness was essentially and absolutely an inheritance. It was therefore entirely different in character from present-day wisdom. People make a great mistake when they try to express the important matters given out by the Holy Rishis in the first post-Atlantean period in forms similar to those employed by the science of today. This is hardly possible. The scientific forms in use today appeared first in the course of post-Atlantean culture. The knowledge of the Ancient Rishis was of a very different kind. Those who communicated it felt how it worked in them, how it rose within them on the instant. If we are to understand what knowledge was at that time, we must realize that its most marked characteristic was that it did not spring in any way from memory. Memory played no part as yet in knowledge. I pray you to keep this in mind. Today memory plays a main part in the passing on of knowledge. When a university professor mounts the platform, or a public speaker addresses an audience, he must be careful to consider beforehand what he is to speak about, and retain it in his memory. Certainly, there are people who say they do not require to do this, they follow their genius; but this does not take them very far. At the present day the passing on of knowledge depends really very largely on memory.
We gain a correct perception of how knowledge was communicated in the ancient Indian epoch if we grant that knowledge first rose in the head of him who communicated it at the moment he passed it on to others. In former times knowledge was not prepared before-hand as it is today. The Rishis did not prepare what they had to say, so that their memory might retain it. They prepared themselves by attuning themselves to what they were about to communicate. They said: “This knowledge [Wissen] is not built on memory in any way. Memory has no part in it, my soul must first enter into a holy atmosphere, it must be attuned to piety!” They prepared this atmosphere, this feeling, but not what they were to say. At the moment of communication it resembled rather a reading aloud from an invisible script. Listeners who took down in writing what was said would have been unthinkable at that time. This would have been an impossibility; anything preserved by such means would have been regarded at that time as worthless. Only those things were considered of value which a man preserved within his soul, and which his soul then moved him to reproduce and impart to others in the same way as he had received them. It would have been regarded as desecration to write down these communications. Why? Because in the opinion of that day it was thought that what was written on paper could not be the same as what was communicated by word of mouth.
This tradition endured for a long time, for such things are retained far longer in the feelings than in the understanding of men, and when in the Middle Ages the art of printing was added to that of writing many people regarded it for long as a black art. The old feeling survived that what passed in a living way from one soul to another should not be preserved in such a grotesquely profane way as was the case when black printer's ink traced spoken words on a white page, thus changing them into something lifeless, in order that later they might be revived  in a way perhaps that was far from edifying. We must therefore regard the direct outpouring [Strömung] from soul to soul as a characteristic feature of the time we are considering. This was an outstanding tendency of the first post-Atlantean epoch, and must be realized if we are to understand, for instance, the old Grecian and Germanic rhapsodists, who moved from place to place reciting their very long poems. If they had employed memory they could never have recited these poems again and again in the same way. It was a soul-force, a soul-attribute, far more living than memory that lay behind these long recitations. Today if anyone recites a poem he must have learnt it beforehand, but these people experienced what they recited, it was as if newly created at the moment. This was strengthened by the fact that in quite other ways than is the case today the soul-element was then more in evidence. In our day, with some justification, everything of a soul nature is more suppressed. When recitations or lectures are given today what matters is the meaning; care is taken as to the meaning of the words. This was not the case when in the Middle Ages a minstrel recited the Nibelungenlied, for example. He had still a certain feeling for the inner rhythm, he even stamped with his foot as he marked its rise and fall. These things were but the echoes of what existed in more ancient times. But you would form no true picture of the Rishis of India and their pupils if you thought they did not communicate the ancient knowledge of Atlantis faithfully. The high-school pupil of today, even if he wrote out the whole lecture, would not have reproduced what had been said as faithfully as the Indian Rishis reproduced the ancient knowledge in their day.
The characteristic feature of the ages that followed is that Atlantean knowledge had ceased to affect them. Up to the decline of the first period, that of the ancient Indian culture, the legacy of knowledge man had received continued. Knowledge continued to increase. This came to an end, however, with the first post-Atlantean period, and afterwards hardly anything new came forth from human nature. Increase in knowledge was therefore only possible in the first period, the early Indian, after that it ceased. In the Persian period among those who were influenced by the teaching of Zarathustra what we can compare with the second age of development in the life of a man began, and it is best understood when so compared. The first period of Indian culture can well be likened to the first part of the life of a man — that from birth to the seventh year — when everything of the nature of form receives its shape; later there is only growth within the established form. Thus it was with the spirit in the first post-Atlantean epoch. What follows later, how man develops the teaching that comes to him in the second part of his life, can be likened to the first period of ancient Persian development and with the instruction then received, only we must be clear as to who the scholars were and who the teachers. I would like to point out something here. Does it not strike you as strange how very differently Zarathustra, the leader of the second post-Atlantean epoch, comes before us to the way, for instance, the Indian Rishis do? While the Rishis appear like holy initiated persons of a far distant age, into whom all the knowledge of ancient Atlantis had poured, Zarathustra comes before us as the first initiate of post-Atlantean times. Something new enters with him. Zarathustra is actually the first historical personality of post-Atlantean times to be initiated into that form of Mystery-knowledge (truly post-Atlantean) in which knowledge was presented in such a way that it was actually comprehensible to the rational understanding of man. What pupils received in those early days in the schools of Zarathustra was pre-eminently a supersensible knowledge, but it dawned in them so that for the first time it took the form of human conceptions. While it is not possible to reproduce the knowledge of the ancient Rishis in the forms of modern science, this is possible with the knowledge of Zarathustra. Certainly this is a purely supersensible knowledge, dealing as it does with the supersensible worlds, but it is clothed in conceptions similar to the conceptions and ideas of post-Atlantean times. Among the followers of Zarathustra a teaching arose of which we can say: “It was constructed systematically in accordance with the rational conceptions of man.” This means it sprang from the ancient holy treasures of wisdom which evolved up to the end of the Indian period, and continued from generation to generation; no new thing was later added to this, but the old was elaborated further. The mission of the Mysteries of the second post-Atlantean period can be realized through a comparison: we can compare it with the publishing of some occult book. Any book that is the result of investigations into higher world can be clothed in a logical arrangement, thus bringing it down to the physical plane. It is possible to do this. But if my “Outline of Occult Science” had been treated in this way a book of fifty volumes would have resulted, each as large as the book itself. If this had been done, each section would have been presented in strictly logical form; this is in the book, and it might have been treated in this way. But it is also possible to proceed otherwise. One can, for instance, leave something to the reader; leave him to think matters out for himself. People must try to do this today; otherwise the work of occultism could not progress.
Now, in the fifth post-Atlantean period, with his acquired powers of forming conceptions, it  is possible for man to approach occult knowledge and to increase it, but at the time of Zarathustra, thoughts had first to be discovered capable of dealing with these facts. At that time knowledge such as we have today did not exist. Something there was that had remained over like an echo from the time of the Rishis, and to this was added what was capable of being clothed in human thoughts. But human conceptions had first to be found, and into them supersensible facts had to be poured. Different degrees in power to grasp what was supersensible then first made its appearance. We may say: The Rishis still spoke absolutely in the way men had always spoken, in a pictorial language, an imaginative language. They passed on the knowledge they possessed from soul to soul when speaking in this vital picture-language which came whenever they had any kind of supersensible knowledge to transmit. With “cause and effect” and the other ideas we have today with logic in any form — men did not concern themselves in the least. All that arose later. Then in the second post-Atlantean period they began to be interested in supersensible knowledge. They then felt for the first time the opposition, as it were, of the physical plane; they felt the necessity of giving expression to what was supersensible so that it might assume forms that thought could grasp on the physical plane. This was the essential mission of the first period of Persian civilization.
Then followed the third period, the period of Egyptian culture. People now had supersensible ideas. This is difficult for the men of today. Try and picture conditions as they were at that time; there was as yet no physical science, but people had ideas that had been gained concerning supersensible worlds, and they could speak of them in the thought-forms of the physical plane.
In the third epoch people began to direct what they had learnt from supersensible worlds to the physical world. This can again be compared with the third life-period of a man. While in the second life-period he learns, he then goes on to employ what he has learnt. In the third period of their lives most people feel constrained to direct their learning to the physical plane.
The pupils of the heavenly knowledge were those who, in the second epoch, had been pupils of Zarathustra, but they now began to direct what they had learnt to the physical plane. Put into modern language we can say: men now learnt that all they beheld through supersensible vision could only be understood if expressed by a triangle; if they used the triangle as an image to express the supersensible, they learnt that the supersensible part of human nature which permeates the physical part can be grasped as a triad. Other conceptions had come to man so that he now applied physical things to what was non-physical. Geometry, for example, was first learnt so that it was accepted as symbolic of ideas. Men had this and made use of it — the Egyptians in the art of surveying and agriculture, the Chaldeans in the study of the stars and the founding of astrology and astronomy. What formerly was held to be only supersensible was now applied to things seen physically. People began to use what had been born in them as supersensible wisdom on the physical plane. This was first done in the third cultural period.
In the fourth period, the Greco-Latin, this became a fact of outstanding importance. Up to that time men possessed supersensible knowledge, but did not use it as described. It was not necessary for the Holy Rishis to use it in this way, for knowledge flowed into them directly from the spiritual world. In the time of Zarathustra people had only to ponder over spiritual knowledge, and they knew exactly the form this knowledge would take.
In the Egypto-Chaldean age they clothed conceptions from spiritual worlds in what they had gained in physical existence, and in the fourth period they said: Is it right that what is acquired from the spiritual world should be applied to physical things? Are the things gained in this way really suited to physical conditions?
These questions were only put by man to himself in the fourth period after he had used this knowledge innocently, and applied it to his physical requirements for a long time. He then became more self-conscious and asked: “What right have I to apply spiritual knowledge to physical uses?”
Now it always happens that in an age when any important task has to be carried out, some person appears who can fulfill this task. It was such a person to whom it first occurred to ask the question: “Have I the right to apply my supersensible ideas to physical facts?” You can see how what I am trying to indicate developed. You can see, for example, how vital Plato's link still was with the ancient world, how he still used ideas in the ancient form, applying them to physical conditions. It was his pupil, Aristotle, who asked the question “Ought one to do this?” For this reason he is regarded as the founder of logic.
Those who do not concern themselves in any way with spiritual science might ask: Why did logic arise first in the fourth epoch? Was there not some reason, seeing that evolution had gone on indefinitely, for man to ask himself this question at a specified time?
When conditions are really studied, important turning points in evolution are seen to occur at certain times. One such important turning point in evolution occurred between the time of Plato and Aristotle. In this age there was still, in a certain sense, something of the old connection with the spiritual world, as this existed in Atlantean times. Living knowledge certainly died in the Indian epoch; but it was replaced by something new that came from above. Man now became critical and asked: How can I apply what is supersensible to physical things? This means: he was then first aware that he could himself accomplish something; observing the world around him he realiaed that he could bring something down into this world. This was a most important age.
We divine [spüren] that conceptions and ideas are supersensible things when from their nature we begin to perceive in them a guarantee for the supersensible world. But very few people do perceive this. For most people the fabric of conceptions and ideas is worn very thin and threadbare. Although they may divine that something lives in these which can give them proof of human immortality, conviction is not reached, because the conceptions and ideas concerning the solid reality for which man craves are of such a thin-spun consistency. For most people the fabric they have spun from conceptions and ideas is very thin and worn; though something lives in it which can give them consciousness of immortality, they are incapable of full conviction. But at a time when humanity had sunk to the final — hardly any longer believed in — shreds of that fabric of ideas which it had spun from higher worlds, a mighty new impulse came from the spiritual world and entered into it — this was the Christ-Impulse. The greatest spiritual Reality entered humanity in our post-Atlantean age at a time when man was least spiritually gifted, when all that remained to him was the spiritual gift of ideas.
For anyone who studies human development in a wide sense, it is a most interesting consideration — apart from the fact that it affects the soul so overwhelmingly — it is most interesting (even scientifically) to compare the infinite spirituality of that essence which entered human evolution with the Christ Principle with that which, like a last thin-spun thread from spiritual realms, caused man to ask shortly before: in what way this thread connected him with spirituality. In other words: when we place Aristotelean logic, this weaving of abstract conceptions to which mankind had at last attained, alongside that great Spiritual Outpouring. We can think of no greater disparity than between the spirituality that came down to the physical plane in the Being of Christ and that which man had preserved for himself. You can therefore understand that in the early Christian centuries it was quite impossible for men to grasp the spiritual nature of Christ with the thin thread of ideas spun from Aristotelean philosophy. Gradually the endeavor arose to grasp the facts of human and world events in a way conformable to Aristotelean logic. This was the task that faced the philosophy of the Middle Ages.
It is important for us now to compare the fourth post-Atlantean epoch with the fourth period in the life of a man — that period in which the ego develops — to see how the “I am” of all humanity entered human evolution at a time when humanity as a whole was really furthest withdrawn from the spiritual world. This is why man was at first quite incapable of comprehending Christ except through faith; why Christianity had at first to be a matter of faith; only later, and by degrees, was it to become a matter of knowledge. It will become a matter of knowledge; but we have only now begun to enter with understanding into the study of the Gospels. For hundreds and hundreds of years Christianity was only a matter of faith, and had to be so, because man had descended furthest from the spiritual world.
As this was man's position in the fourth post-Atlantean period, it was necessary after so deep a descent that he should begin to rise once more. The fourth period brought him furthest on the downward path, but also gave him the first great impulse upward. Naturally this spiritual impulse could not be understood at first; only in the periods that follow will it be possible for him to understand it. But now we can at least recognize the task before us: We have to refill our ideas with spirit from within.
The evolution of the world is not simple. When, for instance, a ball starts rolling in one direction, its momentum tends to make it continue rolling in the same direction. If this is to be changed another impulse must come to give the thrust necessary to a change of direction.
Pre-Christian culture had the tendency to continue the downward plunge into the physical world, and has continued to do so to our day. The upward tendency is only beginning, hence the need of a constant incentive to this upward direction. We can see this downward tendency more especially in men's thoughts. The greater part of what is called philosophy today is nothing more than the continued downward roll of the ball. Aristotle divined something of this; he grasped the fact that there was a spiritual reality in the fabric of human thoughts. But a couple of centuries after his day, men were no longer capable of realizing that the content of the human head was connected with reality. The driest, most desiccated ideas of the old philosophy are those of Kant and everything associated with Kantism. Kant's philosophy puts the main question in such a way that he cuts every link between what man evolves as ideas, between perceptions as an inner life, and that which ideas really are. All this is old and dead, and is therefore not fitted to give any vital uplift for the future. You will now no longer wonder that the conclusion of my lectures on psychology had a theosophical background. I explained that in all we strive for, more especially as regards knowledge of the soul, our task must be to allow ourselves to be so stimulated by this knowledge, given to us formerly by the Gods and brought down by us to Earth, that we can offer it up again on the altars of the Gods.: We have only to make the ideas that come to us from the spiritual world once more our own.
It is not from any want of modesty that I say: Teaching regarding the soul must of necessity be a scientific teaching, that it must rise again from the frozen state into which it has fallen. There have been many psychologists in the past and there are many still today, but the ideas they use are void of spiritual life. It is a significant sign that a man like Franz Brentano allowed the first volume of his book on psychology to appear in 1874. Though much it contains is distorted, it is on the whole correct. The second volume was ready, and was to have been published that year, but he was unable to complete it, he stuck in it. He still could give an outline of his teaching, but the spiritual impulse necessary if the work was to be brought to a conclusion was wanting.
Such psychologists as we have today — Von Wundt and Lipps, for example — are not really psychologists, for they work only with preconceived ideas; from the first they were incapable of producing anything. Brentano's psychology was fitted to do this, but it remained incomplete. This is the fate of all knowledge that is dying. Death does not enter the domain of natural science so quickly. Here people can work with ideas, for the facts they have accumulated speak for themselves. In the Science of Spirit this does not happen so easily. The whole substratum is immediately lost if people employ ordinary ideas. The muscles of the heart do not immediately cease to beat even if analyzed like a mineral product without any recognition of their true nature; but the soul cannot be analyzed in this way.
Thus science dies from above downwards, and men will gradually reach a point where they will certainly be able to appreciate natural laws, but in a way entirely independent of science. The construction of machines, instruments, telephones and the like, is something very different from understanding science in the right way or carrying it a step further. Anyone can make use of an electric apparatus without necessarily understanding it. True science is gradually dying. We have now reached a point where external science must receive new life from spiritual science. Our fifth period of culture is that in which the ball of science rolls slowly downhill.
When it can roll no further its activity will cease, as in the case of Brentano. At the same time the upward progress of humanity must receive ever more life. And it will receive it. This can only happen when efforts are made by which knowledge, even if this has been gained outwardly, becomes fruitful through what occult investigation has to give. Our age, the fifth period, will increasingly assume a character which will show that the ancient Egypto-Chaldean epoch is repeated in it; as yet we have not gone very far with this repetition, it is only beginning. That this is the case can be gathered from what occurred at our annual general meeting. On that occasion Herr Seiler spoke about “Astrology,” showing that as spiritual scientists you were in a position to connect certain conceptions with astrological ideas, whereas this was not possible with the ideas of modern astronomy. Modern astronomy would consider these ideas to be nonsense. This is not because of what astronomical science is in itself — for this science has a better opportunity than any other of being led back to what is spiritual — but because men's thoughts are far removed from any return to spirituality. There is a means, through what astronomy has to offer, by which such a return might easily be made to the fundamental truths of astrology, so undervalued today. But some time must elapse before a bridge can be formed between these two. During this time all kinds of theories will be devised, theories by which the movements of the planets, for instance, will be explained in a purely materialistic way. Things will be still more difficult in the domain of chemistry, and in everything connected with life. Here it will he still more difficult to build the bridge. It will he done most easily in the domain of soul-knowledge. To do so it is necessary that people should understand what was stated at the conclusion of my lecture on psychology. There I showed that the stream of soul-life does not only flow from the past toward the future, but also from the future into the past; that we have two time-streams — the etheric part of the life of the soul goes toward the future, the astral part of us on the other hand flows back toward the past. (There is probably no one on the Earth today who is conscious of this unless he has an impulse toward what is spiritual.) We are first able to form a conception of the life of the soul when we realize that something comes continually to meet us out of the future. Otherwise this is quite impossible. We must be able to form such a conception, and for this, when speaking of cause and effect, we must break with those ordinary methods of thought which deal mainly with the past. We must not only reckon with the past in such connections, but must speak of the future as something real; something that comes toward us in just as real a way as the past slips from us. But it will be a long time yet before such ideas become prevalent, and till they do there will be no psychology.
The nineteenth century produced a smart idea: “Psychology without souls.” People were very proud of this idea, and with it they declared: “We simply study the revelations of the human soul, but do not concern ourselves with the soul that is the cause of these!”
A Soul-teaching without Souls! This can he carried further; but what results (to use a common comparison) is nothing else than a mealtime without food. Such is psychology! Now people are of course not satisfied when dinnertime comes and the plates are empty; but the science of the nineteenth century was strangely satisfied with the psychology put before it, which was in no way concerned with the soul. This began comparatively early — but into every part of it spiritual life must flow.
Therefore we have to record the beginning among us of an entirely new life. The old in a certain sense is finished and a new life must begin. We must feel this. We must feel that a primeval wisdom came to us from ancient Atlantean times, that this gradually declined, and we are now faced with the task of beginning in our present incarnation to gather more and more new wisdom, which will be the wisdom of the men of a later day. The coming of the Christ-Impulse made this possible. It will continually develop a living activity, and from it men will perhaps be able best to evolve toward the real, historic Christ, when all tradition concerning Him and all that is outwardly connected with these traditions has died away.
From what has been said you can see how the post-Atlantean evolution can actually he compared with the life of a single man; how it is indeed a kind of macrocosm facing man, the microcosm. But the individual man is in a very strange position. What is left to him for the second half of his life of all he acquired in the first half, which when used up is followed by death?
The spirit alone can conquer death and carry on to a new incarnation that which gradually begins to decay when we have passed the first half of our life. Our evolution advances until our thirty-fifth year, then it begins to decline. But the spirit then first begins truly to rise! What it is unable to develop further in the second half of life within the body, it brings to completion in a succeeding incarnation. Thus we see the body gradually decline, but the spirit blossom more and more.
The macrocosm reveals a picture similar to that of man: Up to the fourth post-Atlantean epoch we have a youthful upward striving cultural development; from then onwards a real decline; death everywhere as regards the development of human consciousness; but at the same time the dawn of a new spiritual life. The spiritual life of man will be born again in the age following our present one. But he will have to work with full consciousness on what is to be reincarnated. When this happens the other must die, truly die. We gaze prophetically into the future; many sciences have arisen and will arise for the benefit of post-Atlantean civilization — they, however, belong to what is dying. The life that streamed directly into human life along with the Impulse of Christ will in future rise in man in the same way as Atlantean knowledge rose within the holy Rishis.
What ordinary science knows of Copernicus today is but the external part of his knowledge,  the part belonging to decline. That which will live on, that will be fruitful, not only the part through which he has already worked for four centuries, this part man must win for himself. The teaching of Copernicus as given today is not so very true; its truth will first be revealed by spiritual science.
So it is as regards much that is held to be most true in astronomy, and so it will be with everything else which men value as knowledge today. Certainly, what science discovers today is profitable. Therein lies its usefulness. In so far as the science of today is technical it is justified; but in so far as it has something to contribute to human knowledge, it is a dead product. It is useful for trade, but for that no spiritual content is required. In so far as it seeks to discover anything concerning the mysteries of the universe, it belongs to declining civilization. In order to enrich our knowledge of the secrets of the universe, external science must superimpose on all it has to offer the wisdom derived from spiritual science.
What I have said today can form an introduction to our studies on the Gospel of Mark, which are about to begin. But first I had to speak of the necessity for the entrance into humanity of the greatest Spiritual Impulse of all time at a moment when only the last faint shreds of spirituality remained to it.

The Cure for the Luciferic Snakebite : "Christus verus Luciferus"

"Not I, but Christ in me"

Numbers 21:4-9

And they journeyed from mount Hor by the way of the Red sea, to compass the land of Edom: and the soul of the people was much discouraged because of the way.
And the people spake against God, and against Moses, Wherefore have ye brought us up out of Egypt to die in the wilderness? for there is no bread, neither is there any water; and our soul loatheth this light bread.
And the Lord sent fiery serpents among the people, and they bit the people; and much people of Israel died.
Therefore the people came to Moses, and said, We have sinned, for we have spoken against the Lord, and against thee; pray unto the Lord, that he take away the serpents from us. And Moses prayed for the people.
And the Lord said unto Moses, Make thee a fiery serpent, and set it upon a pole: and it shall come to pass, that every one that is bitten, when he looketh upon it, shall live.
And Moses made a serpent of brass, and put it upon a pole, and it came to pass, that if a serpent had bitten any man, when he beheld the serpent of brass, he lived.



John 3:14-21
And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up:
That whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life.
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.
He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil.
For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved.
But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God.

Peace as Strength


Rudolf Steiner, Verse for the Esoteric School



I bear within me peace;
Within myself I bear forces to make me strong.
With the warmth of these forces I shall be imbued.
With the power of my will I shall be filled.
And then I shall feel
How peacefulness pours through all my being
As I strengthen myself
To find peace as strength within myself
Through steadfast inner striving.







Companion Soul Exercises, Morning and Evening

Rudolf Steiner



MORNING


Picture a white cross

with the words


   In the godhood of the world



Add to this, over the crossbeam, three red roses

with the words

   I will find myself




Then add four red roses under the crossbeam

with the words

   I rest therein



Then add a green background

with the words

   the godliness of the soul shines out
   in pure love for every being



then add a purple framing,

its outer edge fading into indistinctness,

with the words

   the godhood of the world gleams out
   in pure rays of light.





(With the words "godliness" and "godhood" we picture the inner and outer CHR power.)




Then, maintaining inner tranquility, remain in expectancy without external impressions and memories. The revelations which the soul is to receive will arise when the time is ripe.




EVENING


Picture the setting sun in white light,

as though the power of the CHR rays out of this light

accompanied by the words

   In pure rays of light
   gleams out the godhood of the world



Then let the image of the sun grow yellow-red,

as if the love of the CHR is gleaming out in the redness,

with the words

   In pure love for every being
   shines out the godliness of the soul



Then transform the image of the sun into green,

allowing four red roses to appear upon its lower half,

with the words

   I rest in the godhood of the world



Then three red roses in its upper half,

with the words

   I will find myself



Then a black cross on the green background

with the words

   In the godhood of the world



Then fall asleep in the mood engendered by these phrases.








Related post: http://martyrion.blogspot.com/2015/03/the-godhood-of-world.html
Source: Rudolf Steiner, Soul Exercises, pp. 116-117

Seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness





Matthew 6:19-34
Lay not up for yourselves treasures upon earth, where moth and rust doth corrupt, and where thieves break through and steal:
But lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust doth corrupt, and where thieves do not break through nor steal:
For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.
The light of the body is the eye: if therefore thine eye be single, thy whole body shall be full of light.
But if thine eye be evil, thy whole body shall be full of darkness. If therefore the light that is in thee be darkness, how great is that darkness!
No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.
Therefore I say unto you, Take no thought for your life, what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink; nor yet for your body, what ye shall put on. Is not the life more than meat, and the body than raiment?
Behold the fowls of the air: for they sow not, neither do they reap, nor gather into barns; yet your heavenly Father feedeth them. Are ye not much better than they?
Which of you by taking thought can add one cubit unto his stature?
And why take ye thought for raiment? Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow; they toil not, neither do they spin:
And yet I say unto you, That even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these.
Wherefore, if God so clothe the grass of the field, which to day is, and to morrow is cast into the oven, shall he not much more clothe you, O ye of little faith?
Therefore take no thought, saying, What shall we eat? or, What shall we drink? or, Wherewithal shall we be clothed?
(For after all these things do the Gentiles seek:) for your heavenly Father knoweth that ye have need of all these things.
But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you.
Take therefore no thought for the morrow: for the morrow shall take thought for the things of itself. Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof.