Rudolf Steiner: "If, on the other hand, Arianism alone had won the day, there would of course have been much talk of this god in the inner being of man. But it would not have been spoken of with the necessary depth of reverence, and above all, not with the necessary inward dignity. Arianism alone would indeed have come to regard man at every stage as an incarnation of the god who dwells within him. But the same may be said of any animal, indeed of the whole world, of every plant, of every stone. This conception only has real value if it contains at the same time the active impulse to rise ever higher and higher in spiritual development, for then only do we find the god within. The statement that there is a divine within us at any and every stage of life can have a meaning only if we take hold of this divine in a perpetual upward striving of the self by whom it is not yet attained."
Rudolf Steiner: "In older languages the self was not specifically designated, for it was contained within the verb. The ‘I’ was not directly mentioned. The verb was used to show what one was doing, and this was what indicated that one was speaking about oneself. There was no name for the self. It only came about in later times that the human being gave his self a name, and in our German language that name [ich] contains the initials of Jesus Christ, which is an important symbolic fact." [Iesus CHristus: ICH]
Source: Karmic Relationships, vol. 8, lecture 8. September 19, 1924. pp. 122-123
Related posts:
https://martyrion.blogspot.com/2020/07/holy-fervor.html
https://martyrion.blogspot.com/2019/09/spiritual-invincibility-what-archangel.html
https://martyrion.blogspot.com/2019/10/keep-calm-and-become-worthy_11.html
https://martyrion.blogspot.com/2019/02/do-not-lose-your-center-fighting-world.html
http://martyrion.blogspot.com/2018/06/sleepers-awaken.html
http://martyrion.blogspot.com/2017/11/the-yoga-of-anthroposophy_28.html
https://martyrion.blogspot.com/2021/05/yogananda-bliss-of-union-with-christ.html
No comments:
Post a Comment