The Gospel of Luke. Lecture 3 of 10.
Rudolf Steiner, Basel, September 17, 1909:
Whoever turns to
the Gospel of St. Luke will, to begin with, only be able to feel dimly something
of what it contains; but an inkling will then dawn on him that whole worlds,
vast spiritual worlds, are revealed by this Gospel. After what was said in the
last lecture this will be obvious to us, for as we heard, spiritual research
shows how the Buddhistic world-conception, with everything it was able to give
to mankind, flowed into the Gospel of St. Luke. It may truly be said that
Buddhism radiates from this Gospel, but in a special form, comprehensible to the
simplest and most unsophisticated mind.
As could be
gathered from the last lecture and will become particularly clear today, to
understand Buddhism as presented to the world in the teachings of the great
Buddha demands the application of lofty conceptions and an ascent to the pure,
ethereal heights of the spirit; a very great deal of preparation is required to
grasp the essence of Buddhism. Its spiritual substance is contained in the
Gospel of St. Luke in a form that can influence everyone who recognizes concepts
and ideas that are essential for humanity. This will be readily understood when
we get to the root of the mystery underlying the Gospel of St. Luke. Not only
are the spiritual attainments of Buddhism presented to us through this Gospel:
they come before us in an even nobler form, as though raised to a level higher
than when they were a gift to humanity in India some six hundred years before
our era.
In the lecture
yesterday we spoke of Buddhism as the purest teaching of compassion and love;
from the place in the world where Buddha worked a gospel of love and compassion
streamed into the whole spiritual evolution of the Earth. The gospel of love and
compassion lives in the true Buddhist when his own heart feels the suffering
confronting him in the outer world from all living creatures. There we encounter
Buddhistic love and compassion in the fullest sense of the words; but from the
Gospel of St. Luke there streams to us something that is more than this
all-embracing love and compassion. It might be described as the translation of
love and compassion into deed. Compassion in the highest sense of the
word is the ideal of the Buddhist; the aim of one who lives according to the
message of the Gospel of St. Luke is to unfold love that acts. The true
Buddhist can himself share in the sufferings of the sick; from the Gospel of St.
Luke comes the call to take active steps to do whatever is possible to bring
about healing. Buddhism helps us to understand everything that stirs the human
soul; the Gospel of St. Luke calls upon us to abstain from passing judgment, to
do more than is done to us, to give more than we receive! Although
in this Gospel there is the purest, most genuine Buddhism, love translated into
deed must be regarded as a progression, a sublimation, of Buddhism.
This aspect of
Christianity — Buddhism raised to a higher level — could be truly described only
by one possessed of the heart and disposition of the writer of the Gospel of St.
Luke. It was eminently possible for him to portray Christ Jesus as the healer of
body and soul because having himself worked as a physician he was able to write
in the way that appealed so deeply to the hearts of men. That he recorded what
he had to say about Christ Jesus from the standpoint of a physician will become
more and more apparent as we penetrate into the depths of the Gospel.
But something
else strikes us when we consider what an impression this Gospel can make upon
even the most childlike natures. The lofty teachings of Buddhism, to understand
which mature intelligence is required, appear to us in the Gospel of St. Luke as
though rejuvenated, as though born anew from a fountain of youth. Buddhism is a
fruit on the tree of humanity, and when we find it again in this Gospel it seems
to be like a rejuvenation of what it had previously been. It is only possible to
understand this rejuvenation by paying close attention to the great Buddha's
teachings themselves and discerning with spiritual eyes the powers working in
Buddha's soul.
In the first
place it must be remembered that the Buddha had been a Bodhisattva, that is to
say, a very lofty being able to gaze deeply into the mysteries of existence. As
a Bodhisattva, the Buddha had participated in the evolution of humanity
throughout the ages. When in the epoch following Atlantis the first
post-Atlantean civilization was established and promoted, Buddha was already
present as Bodhisattva and, acting as an intermediary, conveyed to humankind from the
spiritual worlds the teachings indicated in the lecture yesterday. He had been
present in Atlantean and even in Lemurian times. And because he had reached such
a high stage of development he was also able, during the twenty-nine years of
his final existence as Bodhisattva, from his birth to the moment when he became
Buddha, to recollect stage by stage all the communities in which he had lived
before incarnating for the last time in India. He could look back upon his
participation in the labors of humanity, upon his existence in the
divine-spiritual worlds in order that he might bring down from there what it was
his mission to impart to mankind. It was indicated yesterday that even an
individuality of this lofty rank must live through again, briefly at any rate,
what he has already learnt. Thus Buddha describes how while still a Bodhisattva
he gradually rose to higher stages of consciousness, how his spiritual vision
became ever more perfect and his enlightenment complete.
We are told how
he described to his disciples the path his soul had traversed and how he was
able by degrees to recollect his experiences in the past. He spoke to them
somewhat as follows. ‘There was a time, O ye monks, when an all-pervading light
appeared to me from the spiritual world, but as yet I could distinguish nothing
in it — neither forms, nor pictures: my enlightenment was not yet pure enough.
Then I began to see not only the light, but single pictures, single forms,
within the light; but I could not distinguish what these forms and pictures
denoted: my enlightenment was not yet pure enough. Then I began to realize that
spiritual beings were expressing themselves in these forms and pictures; but
again I could not distinguish to what kingdoms of the spiritual world these
beings belonged: my enlightenment was not yet pure enough. Then I learnt to know
to which of the various kingdoms of the spiritual world these several beings
belonged; but I could not yet distinguish through what actions they had acquired
their place in the spiritual realms, nor what was their condition of soul: for
my enlightenment was not yet pure enough. Then came the time when I could
discern through what actions these spiritual beings had acquired their place in
the spiritual realms, and what was their condition of soul; but I could not yet
distinguish with which particular spiritual beings I myself had lived in former
times, nor how I was related to them: for my enlightenment was not yet pure
enough. Then came the time when I was able to know that I was together with
certain beings in particular epochs and was related to them in this way or in
that: I knew what my previous lives had been. Now my enlightenment was
pure!’
In this way
Buddha indicated to his disciples how he had gradually worked his way to
knowledge which, although he had already attained it in an earlier epoch, had
nevertheless to be freshly acquired in accordance with the conditions prevailing
in each successive incarnation. In Buddha's case this knowledge had necessarily
to be in a form in keeping with his complete descent into a physical human body.
If we enter into these things with the right feeling we shall get an inkling of
the greatness and significance of the individuality who incarnated at that time
in the king's son of the family of Sakya. Buddha knew that the world he himself
could again experience and behold would be inaccessible to men's ordinary
faculty of vision in the immediate present and future. Only initiates — and
Buddha himself was an initiate — could gaze into the spiritual world; for normal
humanity this was no longer possible. Inherited remains of the old clairvoyance
had become increasingly rare. But Buddha had not come to speak to men only of
what initiates had to say; his primary mission was to convey to them knowledge
of the forces that must flow out of the human soul itself. Hence he could
not speak only of the fruits of his own enlightenment, but he said to himself:
‘I must speak to men of what they can attain through the higher development of
their own inner nature and of the faculties belonging to this epoch.'
In the course of
Earth evolution men will gradually come to recognize the content of Buddha's
teaching as something that their own reason, their own soul, tells them. But
long, long ages will have to pass before all men are mature enough to produce
out of their own souls what Buddha was the first to bring to expression
in the form of pure knowledge. For to develop certain faculties in later ages is
not the same as to bring them forth for the first time from the depths of the
human soul. Let us take another example. Today even the young are able to
assimiliate the principles of logic and unfold logical thinking. Logical
thinking is now one of the general faculties possessed by man and developed from
his own inner nature. But it was in Aristotle, the great Greek thinker, that
this faculty first arose from a human soul. There is a difference between
bringing forth something for the first time from the soul and bringing it forth
after it has already been developing for a period in humanity.
Buddha's message
to men was among the very greatest of teachings and will remain so for long,
long ages. Hence the soul of a Bodhisattva, the soul of one enlightened to such
a supreme degree, was needed in order that this teaching should for the first
time become a living power in a human being. Only the highest degree of
enlightenment could enable the soul to give birth to what was to become a
universal endowment of mankind — namely, the lofty doctrine of compassion and
love. Buddha's message had to be presented in words familiar to the humanity of
that time, especially to the people of his homeland. Reference has already been
made to the fact that at the time of Buddha the Sankhya and Yoga philosophies
were being taught in India. From them were derived the terminologies and
concepts in use at the time. Anyone who brought a new message had necessarily to
use current parlance, and Buddha too clothed what was living within him in
concepts familiar to his contemporaries. True, he recast these concepts into
completely new forms, but he was obliged to use them. The principle of all
evolution must be that the future is based on the past. And so Buddha clothed
his sublime wisdom in expressions customary in the Indian teachings of that
time.
We must now try
to picture what Buddha experienced during the seven-day period of his
‘Enlightenment’ under the Bodhi-tree. This teaching was to become the deepest,
most intimate concern of mankind. Let us therefore try to conceive, even if with
thoughts only approximately adequate, what profound experiences were undergone
by Buddha under the Bodhi tree and then came to expression in his soul.
He might have
said that there were times in the ancient past when many human beings were dimly
clairvoyant and that in an even more distant past this was the case with
everyone. What does it mean — to be ‘dimly clairvoyant’, or ‘clairvoyant’? To be
clairvoyant means to be able to use the organs of the etheric body. When
a man is able to use the organs of his astral body only he can, it is true,
inwardly feel and experience profound mysteries, but there can be no actual
vision. Clairvoyance cannot arise until what is experienced in the astral body
makes its ‘impress’ in the etheric body. Even the old, dim clairvoyance
originated from the fact that in the etheric body, which had not yet passed
completely into the physical body, there were organs which it was still possible
for ancient humanity to use. What, therefore, was it that men lost in the course
of time? They lost the capacity to use the organs of the etheric body! They were
obliged to make use of the external organs of the physical body only,
experiencing in the astral body, in the form of thoughts, feelings, and mental
pictures, what the physical body transmitted. All this passed through the soul
of the great Buddha as the expression of what he experienced. He said to
himself: ‘Men have lost the capacity to use the organs of their etheric bodies.
They experience in their astral bodies what they learn from the outer world
through the instrumentality of their physical bodies.’
Buddha now
concerned himself with this significant question: ‘When the eye perceives the
color red, when the ear hears a sound, a tone, when the sense of taste has
received some impression, under normal conditions these impressions become
concepts and ideas, are inwardly experienced in the astral body. If they were
experienced in this way alone they could not, in normal circumstances, be
accompanied by pain and suffering. Were man simply to abandon himself to the
impressions of the outer world as the latter with its light, colors, sounds,
and so forth, affects his senses, he would pass through the world without
experiencing pain and suffering from the impressions made upon him. Only under
certain conditions can pain and suffering be experienced by man.’
Hence the great
Buddha sought to discover the conditions under which man experiences pain,
suffering, cares, and afflictions. When and why do the impressions of the outer
world become fraught with suffering? Then he said to himself: Looking back into
ancient times it is revealed that in men's earlier incarnations on the Earth
certain beings worked into their astral bodies from two sides. In the course of
incarnations through the epochs of Lemuria and Atlantis the Luciferic beings
penetrated into human nature, and their influences took actual effect in the
human astral body. Then, from the Atlantean epoch onwards, man was also worked
upon by beings under the leadership of Ahriman. Thus in the course of his
earlier incarnations man was subjected to the influences of both the Luciferic
and Ahrimanic beings. Had these beings not worked upon him he could have
acquired neither freedom nor the capacity to distinguish between good and evil,
nor free will. From a higher point of view, therefore, it is fortunate that
these influences were exercised upon him, although it is true that in a certain
respect they led him from divine-spiritual heights more deeply into material
existence than he would otherwise have descended.
The great Buddha
could therefore say that man bears within himself influences due to the invasion
of Lucifer on the one side and Ahriman on the other. These influences have
remained with him from earlier incarnations. When, with his old clairvoyance,
man was still able to gaze into the spiritual world, he perceived the influences
of Lucifer and Ahriman and could clearly distinguish them. He could say: This
particular influence comes from Lucifer, this other from Ahriman. And inasmuch
as with his vision of the astral world he perceived the harmful influences of
Lucifer and Ahriman, he could reckon with and protect himself from them. He knew
too, how he had come into contact with these beings. There was a time — so said
Buddha — when men knew whence came the influences they had borne within
themselves from incarnation to incarnation since bygone ages. But with the loss
of the old clairvoyance this knowledge was also lost; man is now ignorant of the
influences that have worked upon his soul through the series of incarnations.
The earlier clairvoyant knowledge has been replaced by ignorance. Darkness now
envelops man; he cannot perceive whence come these influences of Lucifer and
Ahriman, but they are there within him! He has within him something of which he
knows nothing. It would be folly to deny the reality and effectiveness of
something that exists even though people are ignorant of it. The influences
that have penetrated into man from incarnation to incarnation are working in
him. They are there and they work through his whole life — only he is unaware of
them!
What effect have
these influences in man? Although he cannot actually recognize them for what
they are, he feels them; there is a power within him that is the expression of
what has continued from incarnation to incarnation and has entered into his
present form of existence. These forces, the nature of which man cannot
recognize, are represented by his desire for external life, for experience in
the world, by his thirst and craving for life. Thus the ancient Luciferic and
Ahrimanic influences work within man as the thirst, the craving, for existence.
This ‘thirst for existence’ continues from incarnation to incarnation. This, in
effect, is what the great Buddha said. But to his intimate pupils he gave more
detailed explanations.
How he presented
what he thus felt can be understood only if there has been a certain preparation
through Anthroposophy. We know that when a man dies his astral body and his ego
leave the physical and etheric bodies. Then he has before him, for a certain
time, the great memory-tableau of his last life in the form of a vast picture.
The main part of his etheric body is then cast off as a second corpse and
something like an extract or essence of this etheric body remains; he bears this
extract with him through the periods of Kamaloka and Devachan and brings it back
again into his next incarnation. While he is in Kamaloka there is inscribed into
this life-extract everything he has experienced through his deeds, everything
that has been incurred in the way of human karma and for which he has to make
compensation. All this unites with the extract of the etheric body which passes
on from one incarnation to another, and man brings it with him when he again
comes into existence through birth. The term in Oriental literature for what we
call ‘etheric body’ is ‘Linga Sharira’. Thus it is an extract of Linga Sharira
that man takes with him from incarnation to incarnation.
Buddha was able
to say: At birth, the human being brings with him, in his Linga Sharira,
everything it contains from his former incarnations; it is inscribed there
everything of which man, in the present epoch, knows nothing and over which
spreads the darkness of ignorance, although it asserts itself as the ‘thirst for
existence’, the ‘craving for life’. In what is called the ‘craving for life’
Buddha saw everything that comes from previous incarnations and drives man to
long avidly for enjoyment in the world, so that he does not merely move though
the world of colors, tones, and other impressions, but yearns for this world.
This force exists in man from previous incarnations. Buddha's pupils called it
‘Samskara’. Buddha spoke to his intimate pupils to the following effect. — What
is characteristic of man is his ignorance, his ‘non-perception’ of something
very significant that is in him. Because of this ignorance, this non-perception,
everything that confronts man from the Luciferic and Ahrimanic beings and to
which he might otherwise adopt an effective attitude is transformed into the
‘thirst for existence’, into slumbering forces which rumble darkly within him
from previous incarnations. Man's present thinking has developed from ‘Samskara’
and this is why, in the present cycle of human evolution, nobody is able,
without further effort, to think objectively.
Mark well the
fine distinction made clear by Buddha to his pupils: the distinction between
objective thinking, which has nothing but the object in view, and thinking
influenced by the forces arising from the Linga Sharira. Consider how you
acquire your ‘opinions’ about things; ask yourselves how much you acquire from
these things because they please you and how much because you observe them
objectively. Everything acquired as an apparent truth not as the result of
objective thinking but because old inclinations have been brought from previous
incarnations — all this, according to Buddha, forms an ‘inner organ of thought’.
This organ of thought comprises the sum-total of what a man thinks because
certain experiences in former incarnations remain in his Linga Sharira as a
residue. Buddha saw in the inner being of man a kind of inner organ of thought
formed from Samskara, and he said: ‘It is this thought-substance that forms in
man what is called his ‘present individuality’ — in Buddhism, ‘Name and Form’,
or ‘Kamarupa’. ‘Ahankara’ is the term used in another philosophy.
Buddha spoke to
his pupils somewhat as follows. In primeval times, when men were still
clairvoyant and beheld the world lying behind physical existence, they all, in a
certain sense, saw the same, for the objective world is the same for everyone.
But when the darkness of ignorance spread over the world, each man brought with
him individual capacities which distinguished him from his fellows. This made
him into a being best described as having a particular form of soul. Each human
being had a name which distinguished him from another — each had an ‘Ahankara’.
What is thus created in man's inner nature under the influence of what he has
brought with him from former incarnations and accounts for his ‘Name and Form’,
his individuality — this builds in him, from within outwards, Manas and the five
sense-organs, the so-called ‘six organs’.
Note well that
Buddha did not say: ‘The eye is merely formed from within outwards’; but he
said: ‘Something that was in Linga Sharira and has been brought over from
previous stages of existence is membered into the eye.’ Hence the eye does not
see with pure, unclouded vision; it would look into the world of outer existence
quite differently if it were not inwardly permeated with the residue of earlier
stages of existence. Hence the ear does not hear with full clarity, but
everything is dimmed by this residue. The result is that there is mingled into
all things the desire to see this or that, to hear this or that, to taste or
perceive in one way or another. Into everything man encounters in the present
cycle of existence there is insinuated what has remained from earlier
incarnations as ‘desire’. If this element of desire were absent — so said Buddha
— man would look out into the world as a divine being; he would let the world
work upon him and no longer desire anything more than is granted to him, nor
wish his knowledge to exceed what was bestowed upon him by the divine powers; he
would make no distinction between himself and the outer world, but would feel
himself membered into it. He feels himself separated from the rest of the world
only because he craves for more and different enjoyment than the world
voluntarily offers him. This leads to the consciousness that he is different
from the world. If he were satisfied with what is in the world he would not
distinguish himself from it; he would feel his own existence continuing in the
outer world. He would never experience what is called ‘contact’ with the outer
world, for, not being separate from it, he could not come into ‘contact’ with
it. The forming of the ‘six organs’ was responsible for the gradual
establishment of ‘contact with the outer world’; contact gave rise to
feeling, and feeling to the urge to cling to the outer world. But it is
because man tries to cling to the outer world that pain, suffering, cares, and
afflictions arise.
This is what
Buddha taught his pupils regarding the ‘inner man’ as the cause of pain,
suffering, cares, and afflictions. It was a delicately woven, sublime theory —
but a theory that sprang directly from life, for an ‘Enlightened One’ had
experienced it as a profound truth concerning the humanity of his time. Having
guided humanity as Bodhisattva for thousands and thousands of years in
accordance with the principles of love and compassion, there dawned in him, when
he became Buddha, knowledge of the true nature and the causes of suffering. He
was able to know why man suffers, and explained this to his intimate disciples.
And when his development was so advanced that he could experience the very
essence and meaning of human existence in the present cycle of evolution, he
summarized it all in the famous sermon at Benares with which he inaugurated his
work as Buddha. There he presented in a popular form what he had previously
communicated to his disciples in a more intimate way.
He spoke
somewhat as follows. — Whoever knows the causes of human existence realizes
that life, as it is, must be fraught with suffering. The first teaching I have
to give you concerns suffering in the world. The second teaching concerns
the causes of suffering. Wherein do these causes lie? They lie in the
fact that the thirst for existence insinuates itself into man from what has
remained in him from previous incarnations. Thirst for existence is the
cause of suffering. The third teaching concerns the question: How is suffering
eliminated from the world? By eliminating its cause; by extinguishing the thirst
for existence proceeding from ignorance! Men have lost their former clairvoyant
knowledge, have become ignorant, and it is this ignorance that conceals the
spiritual world from them. Ignorance is to blame for the thirst for existence,
and this in turn is the cause of suffering and pain, cares and afflictions.
Thirst for existence must disappear from the world if suffering is to disappear.
The old knowledge has passed away from the world; men can no longer use the
organs of the etheric body. But a new knowledge is now possible, the
knowledge acquired when man immerses himself completely in what his astral
body, thanks to its deepest forces, can give him, and with the help of what
his outer sense-organs enable him to observe in the external physical world.
What is thus kindled in the deepest forces of the astral body and is developed
with the cooperation of the physical body — although not actually derived from
it — this alone can help man to begin with, and give him knowledge; for this
knowledge is at first bestowed upon him as a gift. It was to this effect that
Buddha spoke in his great inaugural sermon.
He knew that he
must transmit to humanity the kind of knowledge that is attainable through the
highest development of the forces of the astral body. Hence he had to teach that
through deep and penetrating understanding of the forces of the astral body man
acquires knowledge that is both appropriate and possible for him but is at the
same time untouched by influences from earlier incarnations. Buddha wished to
impart to men a kind of knowledge that has nothing to do with what slumbers in
the darkness of ignorance within the human soul as Samskara. Such knowledge is
acquired by waking to life all the forces contained in the astral body in one
incarnation. ‘The cause of suffering in the world’ — so said Buddha — ‘is that
something of which man knows nothing has remained behind from earlier
incarnations. This legacy from earlier incarnations is the cause of man's
ignorance concerning the world; it is the cause of his suffering and pain. But
when he becomes conscious of the nature of the forces in his astral body he
can, if he will, acquire a knowledge that has remained independent of all
influences from earlier times — a knowledge that is his very own!’
This was the
knowledge that the great Buddha wished to impart to men, and he did so in the
form of what is known as the ‘Eightfold Path’. There he indicates the capacities
and qualities which man must develop in order to attain, in the present cycle of
human evolution, knowledge that is uninfluenced by the ever-recurring births.
Thus by the power he had himself acquired, Buddha raised his soul to the heights
attainable by means of the strongest forces of the astral body, and in the
‘Eightfold Path’ he showed humanity the way to a kind of knowledge uninfluenced
by Samskara. He described the path as follows. —
Man attains this
kind of knowledge about the world when he acquires a right view of
things, a view that has nothing to do with sympathy or antipathy or preference
of any sort. He must strive as best he can to acquire the right view of each
thing, purely according to what presents itself to him outwardly. That is the
first principle: the right view of things. Secondly, man must become
independent of what has remained from earlier incarnations; he must also
endeavor to judge in accordance with his right view of a thing and not be
swayed by any other influences. Thus right judgment is the second
principle. The third is that he must strive to give true expression to what he
desires to communicate to the world, having first acquired the right view and
right judgment of it; not only his words but every manifestation of his being
must express his own right view — that and that alone. This is right
speech. The fourth principle is that man must strive to act not according
to his sympathies and antipathies, not according to the dark forces of Samskara
within him, but in such a way that he lets his right view, right judgment, and
right speech become deed. This is right action. The fifth
principle enabling a man to liberate himself from what is within him is that
he should acquire the right vocation and station in the world. We may best
understand what Buddha meant by this if we remember how many people are
dissatisfied with the tasks devolving upon them, believing that some other
position would be more advantageous. But a man should be able to derive from the
situation into which he is born or into which fate has placed him the best that
is possible, i.e. to acquire the right ‘occupation’ or ‘vocation’. Whoever finds
no satisfaction in the situation in which he is placed will not be able to
derive from it the power to unfold right activity in the world. This is what
Buddha called right vocation. The sixth principle is that a man should
make increasing efforts to ensure that what he acquires through right views,
right judgment, and so forth shall become habit in him. He is born into
the world with certain habits. A child gives evidence of this or that
inclination or habit. But man's endeavors should be directed not toward
retaining the habits proceeding from Samskara but toward acquiring those that
gradually become his own as the result of right views, right judgment, right
speech, and so on. These are the right habits. The seventh principle is
that a man should bring order into his life through not invariably forgetting
yesterday when he has to act today. He would never accomplish anything if he
had to learn his skills anew each time. He must strive to develop
recollectedness, mindfulness, regarding everything in his life. He must always
turn to account what he has already learnt, he must link the present with the
past. Thus along the Eightfold Path man must acquire right mindfulness in
the sense of Buddha's teaching. The eighth quality is acquired when, without
partiality for one view or another and without being influenced by any element
remaining in him from former incarnations, he surrenders himself with pure
devotion to the things of the world, immerses himself in them and lets them
alone speak to him. This is right contemplation.
This is the
Eightfold Path, of which Buddha said to his disciples that if followed it would
gradually lead to the extinction of the thirst for existence with its attendant
suffering, and impart to the soul something that brings liberation from elements
enslaving it from past lives.
We have now been
able to grasp something of the spirit and origin of Buddhism. We know too what
significance lies in the fact that the Bodhisattva of old became Buddha. The
Bodhisattva had always allowed everything connected with his mission to flow
into humanity. In very ancient times, before Buddha came into the world, men
were not able to apply even their inner forces in such a way that they
themselves could have developed the attributes of the Eightfold Path. Influences
flowing from the spiritual world were necessary to make this possible, and it
was the Bodhisattva of old who enabled these influences to stream down upon
mankind. It was therefore an event of unique significance when this Bodhisattva
became Buddha and now gave forth in the form of teaching what in earlier times
he had caused to flow down upon men from above. He had now brought into the
world a physical body able to unfold out of itself forces that formerly
could flow down from higher realms only. The first body of this kind was
brought into the world by Gautama Buddha. Everything he had formerly caused to
flow down from above became reality in the physical world at that time. It is a
happening of great and far-reaching importance for the whole of Earth evolution
when forces that have streamed down upon humanity from epoch to epoch are
present one day in the bodily nature of a human being on Earth. A power that
can pass over into all men is then engendered.
In the body of
Gautama Buddha lie the causes enabling men in all ages to develop in their own
being the powers of the Eightfold Path. Buddha's existence ensured for men the
possibility of right thinking! And whatever comes to pass in the future in this
respect, until the principles of the Eightfold Path become reality in the whole
of mankind, will all be thanks to that existence. What Buddha bore within
himself he surrendered to men for their spiritual nourishment.
Generally
speaking, no science today perceives these significant facts in the evolution
of humanity, but they are often presented in simple fairy-tales and legends. I
have emphasized more than once that fairy-tales and legends are often wiser and
more truly ‘scientific’ than our objective science itself. In its depths the
human soul has always sensed a certain truth connected with the nature of a
being such as a Bodhisattva: that, to begin with, something streams down from
above, then becomes by degrees a possession of the soul and thereafter rays back
again into the cosmos from the soul itself. Men who were able to feel the
significance of this either dimly or clearly said to themselves: like the rays
of the Sun from the heavens, so did the Bodhisattva once ray down upon the Earth
the forces of the doctrine of compassion and love, the forces developed through
the principles of the Eightfold Path. But then the Bodhisattva descended into a
human body and surrendered to men the power that was once his own possession.
This power now lives in humanity and streams back into the cosmos, as the rays of
the Sun are reflected back in the Moon's light. This was felt to be of special
significance in regions where it was customary to express such a truth in the
form of a fairy-tale or legend. Thus the following remarkable legend was
narrated in the regions where the Bodhisattva appeared.
Once upon a time
the Buddha lived as a hare. It was an age when other creatures of many different
species were looking for food, but it had all been consumed. The plant food
which the hare itself could eat was not suitable for carnivorous creatures. The
hare, who was in reality the Buddha, saw a Brahman passing by and resolved to
sacrifice himself in order to provide food. At that moment the God appeared and
saw the noble deed. A chasm opened and swallowed the hare. Then the God took a
tincture and drew the picture of the hare on the moon. And since that time the
picture of Buddha as the hare is to be seen on the face of the Moon. In the West
we do not speak of the ‘hare in the Moon’ but of the ‘man in the Moon’.
A Kalmuck
fairy-tale expresses this still more cogently. In the Moon lives a hare; it came
there because once upon a time the Buddha sacrificed himself and the
Earth-Spirit drew the picture of the hare on the Moon. This expresses the great
truth of the Bodhisattva becoming Buddha and sacrificing the substance of his
very being to mankind for nourishment, so that his forces now ray out into the
world from the hearts of men.
Of a being such
as the Bodhisattva who became Buddha, we said — and this is the teaching of all
who know: When a being passes through this stage he has had his last incarnation
on the Earth, for his whole nature is contained within a human body. Such a
being never again incarnates in this sense. Hence when the Buddha became aware
of the significance of his present existence he could say: ‘This is my last
incarnation; I shall not again incarnate on the Earth!’ — It would however be
erroneous to think that such a being then withdraws altogether from
Earth-existence. True, he does not enter directly into a physical body, but he
assumes another body — of an astral or etheric nature — and so continues to send
his influences into the world. The way in which such a being who has passed
through the last incarnation belonging to his own destiny continues to work in
the world may be understood by thinking of the following facts.
An ordinary
human being, consisting of physical body, etheric body, astral body, and ego, can
be permeated by such a being. It is possible for a being of this rank, who no
longer descends into a physical body but still has an astral body, to be
membered into the astral body of another human being. This man may well become a
personality of importance, for the forces of a being who has already passed
through his last incarnation on the Earth are now working in him. Thus an astral
being unites with the astral nature of some individual on the Earth. Such a
union may take place in a most complicated way. When the Buddha appeared to the
shepherds in the picture of the ‘heavenly host’ he was not in a physical body
but in an astral body. He had assumed a body in which he could still send his
influences to the Earth. Thus in the case of a being who has become a Buddha we
distinguish three bodies:
1. The body he has before he attains Buddhahood, when he is still working from above as a Bodhisattva; it is a body that does not contain in itself all the powers at his command; he still lives in spiritual heights and is linked with his earlier mission as was the Bodhisattva before his mission became the Buddha's mission. As long as such a being is living in a body of this nature, his body is called a ‘Dharmakaya’;2. The body which such a being builds as his own and through which he brings to expression, in the physical body, everything he has within him. This body is called the ‘body of perfection’, ‘Sambhogakaya’.3. The body which such a being assumes after he has passed through the stage of perfection and can work from above in the way described. This body is called a Nirmanakaya’. [ 1 ]
We can therefore
say that the ‘Nirmanakaya’ of Buddha appeared to the shepherds in the picture of
the angelic host. Buddha appeared in the radiance of his Nirmanakaya and
revealed himself in this way to the shepherds. But he was to find further ways
of working into the events in Palestine at this crucial point of time.
To understand
this we must briefly recall what is known to us from other lectures about the
nature of man. Spiritual science speaks of several ‘births’. At what is called
‘physical birth’ the human being strips off, as it were, the maternal physical
sheath; at the seventh year he strips off the etheric sheath which envelops him
until the change of teeth just as the maternal physical sheath enveloped him
until physical birth. At puberty — about the fourteenth or fifteenth year in the
modern epoch — the human being strips off the astral sheath that is around him
until then. It is not until the seventh year that the human etheric body is born
outwardly as a free body; the astral body is born at puberty, when the outer
astral sheath is cast off.
Let us now
consider what it is that is discarded at puberty. In Palestine and the
neighboring regions this point of time occurs normally at about the twelfth
year — rather earlier than in lands farther to the West. In the ordinary way,
this protective astral sheath is cast off and given over to the outer astral
world. In the case of the child who descended from the priestly line of the
House of David, however, something different happened. At the age of twelve the
astral sheath was cast off but did not dissolve in the universal astral world.
Just as it was, as the protective astral sheath of the young boy, with all the
vitalizing forces that had streamed into it between the change of teeth and
puberty, it now united with the Nirmanakaya of Buddha. The spiritual body that
had once appeared to the shepherds as the radiant angelic host united with the
astral sheath released from the twelve-year-old Jesus, united with all the
forces through which the freshness of youth is maintained during the period
between the second dentition and puberty. The Nirmanakaya which shone upon the
Nathan Jesus-child from birth onwards united with the astral sheath detached
from this child at puberty; it became one with this sheath and was thereby
rejuvenated. Through this rejuvenation, what Buddha had formerly given to
the world could be manifest again in the Jesus-child. Hence the boy was able to
speak with all the simplicity of childhood about the lofty teachings of
compassion and love to which we have referred today. When Jesus was found in
the temple he was speaking in a way that astonished those around him because he
was enveloped by the Nirmanakaya of Buddha, refreshed as from a fountain of
youth by the boy's astral sheath.
These are facts
which can become known to the spiritual investigator and which the writer of the
Gospel of St. Luke has indicated in the remarkable scene when a sudden change
came over the twelve-year-old Jesus in the temple. We must grasp what it was
that had happened and then we shall understand why the boy no longer spoke as he
had formerly been wont to speak. It so happened that at this very time, King
Kanisha of Tibet summoned a Synod in India and proclaimed ancient Buddhism to be
the orthodox religion. But in the meantime Buddha himself had advanced! He had
absorbed the forces of the protective astral sheath of the Jesus-child and was
thereby able to speak in a new way to the hearts and souls of men.
The Gospel of
St. Luke contains Buddhism in a new form, as though springing from a fountain of
youth; hence it expresses the religion of compassion and love in a form
comprehensible to the simplest souls. We can read what the writer of the Gospel
of St. Luke has woven into the text of his Gospel, but still more is contained
in its depths. Only part of what appertains to the scene of Jesus in the temple
could be described today,and even greater depths of this mystery have still to
be explained. Light will then be shed upon the earlier as well as upon the later
years of the life of Jesus of Nazareth.
Notes:1. Also referred to in Buddhist literature as ‘the Body of Transformation’.
Source: http://wn.rsarchive.org/Lectures/Dates/19090917p01.html
No comments:
Post a Comment